After Audio Physic Vigo II's


Where did you go after Audio Physic Virgo II’s? I first listened to AP Virgo’s over at Immedia Sound in Berkeley. It got me hooked again on the music. In the last 10 years I have gone through all the stuff, trading components in and out to arrive at where I am today. The only piece not swapped has been the Virgo’s. Those of you who have had Virgo’s, especially before the change, what did you get? Knowing that every speaker has a sound or style if you will, what was the next step to get you to the next level?

The rest of the configuration. Michell Gyro SE, Brit audio arm and Dynavector 20xH. Highly modified Phillips CDP. Feeding a Reflection Pre (Steve Balliet design and construction), Canary CA 160 monos. IC’s and power cords are Coincident. Speaker cable is Polk Cobra.
luc
Please pardon an interloper. I've never owned Audio Physic speakers but have always considered them a candidate for "what's next."

I'm wondering if those of you with AP experience have adhered to the company's speaker/listener placement guidelines or whether you have used a more traditional setup. And what are you thoughts on each? Do APs perform well if you're unable to place them as the company suggests? Please ignore if this is too far off topic, and again, my apologies. THANKS.
-Bob
I have a pair of VMPS RM30 ribbon hybrids in a large room and a pair of the new Silverline Preludes in a smallish room (which is where I had the Virgo II's). I have to say I like both of these speakers better than the Virgo II. The Preludes cost much less and work extremely well in small to mid-size rooms. Imaging is unbelieveably holographic and you won't believe the quality of the bass that comes out of the two small woofers.
I owned Virgo II's for seven years and had a great time with them. After five years of tweaking them to sound their best in my room (top tips - use the optional straps and spikes on Marigo Bear Feet, put three VPI bricks on top of each one and use the best Nordost speaker wire you can afford). I honestly thought that in many respects they had the best sound I'd ever heard on any system; particularly in terms of refinement and imaging. That said, they did have compromises which I never could overcome including a lack of deep bass, time alignment issues with the drivers, and a tendancy to become edgy and fatiguing if even a small thing was off somewhere else in the system.

For a number of reasons, I've now replaced the Virgos with Vandersteen Quatros, along much of the rest of my system. While after only six months I can't honestly say that they sound better than the Virgos yet, I'm optimistic that they will get there. (The Virgos needed a lot of work too at first.) For now, I've been distracted by other things, such as learning how to work with power tubes (#!%?#). I plan to post my new system soon and perhpas further progress updates. To be continued...
Hi Glide3, could you explain the big differences between the Virgo's and the Avanti III.
Bob- It turned out that my living room had the space to be off the back wall. It sounds great with room behind it. I also have the black ash model, which does not initially look as great as the contrasting woods, but makes it much easier to live with.