After Quad ESL's?


I am enjoying listening to Quad esl-63's and to the 57's (which I prefer). And though my wife has enjoyed them also, she informs me that her heretofore acceptance of the visual impact on our living room has been "only out of love." Her valiant endurance of my Quad-love has come to an end, period.

It has been six years.

So, now the time has come:
Speak, Quad owners (and former Quad owners), about what else has worked for you.

I would like a smaller, (than the quad) used speaker that images better than the Quad's. These are some of the directions I am thinking about:
The Vandersteen 2c Signatures are on the large side.
Perhaps a Dynaudio monitor, B&W 802 Matrix Series III, Proac (are there any that aren't excessively bright?). Are Lowthers a possibility, or too hopelessly colored?

I am attracted to ATC and Merlin, My taste runs expensive, but my pocket book (I work as a concert piano technician) runs shallow.

$1500 a pair or less would work best.

I also welcome your synergistic amplification suggestions. So far, I have prefered the sound of tubed equipmnet in the under $1500 per component range. I have recently been captivated by the idea of TVC (transformer volume control) Bent Audio NOH, etc. with a SET. But, the TacT M2150 (integrated without room correction) also intrigues me. Does anyone know how it sounds?

Acutal experience prefered to conjecture. Let it rip, and I thank you in advance for your thoughts and replies.
earthpulse
Should have listened to "The Horns" from the Horn Shoppe! Had two pairs of 57's (my fav), have 989's. Fi"X" and "Horns"-paradise....
great midrange great price
Couldn't agree more with Robyatt, having acquired a pair of Horns a couple of weeks ago for an 8wpc SEP -- still kind of amazed at how good they are by any standard, let alone in relation to their modest size and price.
When someone finally makes a decision and is pleased with it, it's just so nice when you folks chime in to say he should have done something different. How thoughtful of you!
The horn shoppe horns look fantastic, I bet they sound that way too. Especially with SET or SEP(?) single-ended pentode?

But in my case, as I think I mentioned, my domestic harmony ruled out large obelisks.

Also, with back loaded horns, many here have also complained about beamy high frequencies and wooly bass or less than steller bass, or no low bass at all.

Because the Quads always had these limitations which were a source of irritation to other listeners (I enjoy sharing music with friends) as well as myself, the solutions to these limitations became the criteria any new speaker had to meet.

According to design review (singer/songwriter Pollyanna Bush – see CDBaby.com, for her album), the Gallos Ref 3's are a winner, and that, my friends, is more than half the battle.

Good listening, with good music,
Earthy.
I also preferred the 57's over the 63's and lived with the 57's in a second system for a while. I preferred my Sonus Faber Electa's over the 57's, particularly driven by a tubed amp. So my recommendation would be to try the smaller standmount SF's and maybe use a CJ CAV 50 integrated. You asked for specific experiences so I'll stick to what I've owned and suggest trying Sonus Fabers with CJ tubes.
On the other hand, if imaging is your main priority, there are probably better choices out there than the SF's. But it's hard not to fall for their midrange and purity of tone/timbres.
Good luck

Rooze