stevecham
None of those numbers in that first set of data for FUSE direction 1 vs. 2 are qualifed as statistically significant. Weβre talking differences in microOhm and there should be at least three measurements per trial so that a standard deviation is calculated. But of course, a single number stands as "accurate."
The directionality in our subjective minds is far more compelling than any microOhm differences. Iβll bet no one on earth can hear such differences, only if THEY WANT TO.
>>>>Again, youβre not paying careful attention. The differences in measured resistance, while small, were consistent in that they correlated to the direction of the wire pull. And - as I already mentioned - the measured differences are consistent with listening tests. God gave you two ears and one mouth for a reason. The differences are not (rpt not) insignificant, in any case. I.e., the differences are not (rpt not) random.
Besides, you can eliminate psychological causes by careful testing, no?
None of those numbers in that first set of data for FUSE direction 1 vs. 2 are qualifed as statistically significant. Weβre talking differences in microOhm and there should be at least three measurements per trial so that a standard deviation is calculated. But of course, a single number stands as "accurate."
The directionality in our subjective minds is far more compelling than any microOhm differences. Iβll bet no one on earth can hear such differences, only if THEY WANT TO.
>>>>Again, youβre not paying careful attention. The differences in measured resistance, while small, were consistent in that they correlated to the direction of the wire pull. And - as I already mentioned - the measured differences are consistent with listening tests. God gave you two ears and one mouth for a reason. The differences are not (rpt not) insignificant, in any case. I.e., the differences are not (rpt not) random.
Besides, you can eliminate psychological causes by careful testing, no?