Do speaker cables need a burn in period?


I have heard some say that speaker cables do need a 'burn in', and some say that its totally BS.
What say you?


128x128gawdbless
"Another prominent cable designer believes..."
Prominent cable designer gets three points for admitting to believe rather than claiming.

Instead of burn-in, cable risers, and all other ideas, why someone would not make cables with the principle of Schwann cells? That seems like a very logical next step. Hop-hop and there is a new dimension of "fast" in audio. My cable is faster than yours.

Come on, manufacturers who are quietly monitoring these threads to see what could be sold, try that. Nobody would be able to argue it is crap. It has worked for thousands and thousands and thousands of years and has been produced in countless billions. Now, just to figure out how to make it and that is all. What you are doing now is a copper-age joke.
Actually I had some fast cables. Kimber KGAC silver. How did I know they were faster than my copper Tara's? An example is the beginning of "Hey You" by BTO. It starts out fast. With the silver cables I found myself startled with a jolt even though I knew it was coming. With the copper cables I didn't get that physiological response. I did that many times over the years. End result was the same.
Wait until you hear Schwann cell cables. They will be so fast that the song will finish before it starts.
It’s refreshing to see someone else fall into glubson’s trap of endless back and forth bloviation. 

geoffkait,

It is not a trap. I am selflessly spilling pearls of my imagination for advancement of audio reproduction. Not to mention, Biocables (I just named them this morning) would need to be directional so you get your minute of "I told you so" fame, too. I take care of you. You are welcome.