Exactpower EP2000 vs. PS Audio Power plant P600


Has anyone reviewed these two head to head? If not, I am very interested to hear any reviews on the Exactpower EP2000. I would appreciate any feedback.
hl3402
I have both the PS Audio 600 and the EP2000. The EP-2000 is rated for 2000 W, the P-600 will max out at 720w. The EP-2000will only put out 120V, the P-600 has an ajustable voltage, multi-wave, and balanced power. The EP-2000 is not balanced. The P-600 eats alot more power (for a given output) than the EP-2000.

I have experimented a great deal with these two and wound up using the P-600 for my audio only system, and the EP-2000 for my projection TV and all video sources. I cannot tell a difference between the two on VIDEO sources. I CAN tell a difference on audio. The P-600 is being used exclusively on an ARC VT-200 amplifier. The main difference is in high frequencies where the P-600 gets rid of the last little bit of hash in the treble.

Good luck!!!
Thanks for the responses. Is there anyone else that has compared these or that has used teh exact power?
i read a review that said the exactpower with equitech plugged in beat powerplants-but of course no multiwave or adjustable voltage-otherwise as good or better than powerplants--i will be buying an exactpower in the future when i get the funds because i cant deal with the powerplants innefficiency,heat production,fan and limited power.
I have not played with the ExactPower, but I have auditioned a Power Plant P600 and the Equi=tech. I wound up returning the Power Plant and keeping the Equi=tech. I have a ET5R with Q & MSW Options. I understand that most would consider 230V 30A overkill for the entertainment system power until you hear the difference for your self. In addition, the cost was about $5K to implement rather than $2.4K. The final result using equi=tech offers approximately 4 times the available clean power vs. the power plant, making a comparable PS Audio solution twice as expensive.