No mean-spirit intended, none taken. I'm honestly fascinated by the subject. Had the Beatles made 3 or 4 more albums that weren't "Revolver" quality, how many people would be upset out there? Not me. I like the fact that there are still Stones albums out there that I might still take in, if I have an inkling to. Every now and then I hear a Stones song that I've never heard before. I like that. On the other hand, every Beatles song in existence is sunk into our DNA by now. There's no more.
Put another way - What is your preference for rock career management:
The Police - 5 albums, all great.
The Stones - 30+ albums, a dozen great.
?
Put another way - What is your preference for rock career management:
The Police - 5 albums, all great.
The Stones - 30+ albums, a dozen great.
?