I worked quite a bit on the Gulf but never lived there (nor up in the Delta area of MS). I respect and appreciate what that first hand exposure would have given to Rok. I'll use that to segue into something I'd been thinking about relative to your blues discussion: that is, making a distinction between "blues originals" and "blues interpreters". Blues originals being just that ... the early musicians that heard that stuff and learned it as part of their culture (from the oral tradition) or even composed the music out of their own experience. Blues interpreters being the modern, later musicians that "inherited" this music and didn't have much if anything to do with its origins...composing or experiencing the conditions that gave rise to it. I don't have a problem enjoying blues interpreters but I suspect they don't get respect from all quarters.
I understand what you are saying about "jazz jazz" vs fusion. I don't think it HAS to be that way but fusion does too often seem to be about technical prowess and an intellectual exercise with little "heart". I'm tempted to start a thread along the lines of "Fusion tracks with soul." I really am curious about possible exceptions; i.e., fusion with soul.
Ciao
I understand what you are saying about "jazz jazz" vs fusion. I don't think it HAS to be that way but fusion does too often seem to be about technical prowess and an intellectual exercise with little "heart". I'm tempted to start a thread along the lines of "Fusion tracks with soul." I really am curious about possible exceptions; i.e., fusion with soul.
Ciao