Loudspeakers have we really made that much progress since the 1930s?


Since I have a slight grasp on the history or loudspeaker design. And what is possible with modern. I do wonder if we have really made that much progress. I have access to some of the most modern transducers and design equipment. I also have  large collection of vintage.  I tend to spend the most time listening to my 1930 Shearer horns. For they do most things a good bit better than even the most advanced loudspeakers available. And I am not the only one to think so I have had a good num of designers retailers etc give them a listen. Sure weak points of the past are audible. These designs were meant to cover frequency ranges at the time. So adding a tweeter moves them up to modern performance. To me the tweeter has shown the most advancement in transducers but not so much the rest. Sure things are smaller but they really do not sound close to the Shearer.  http://www.audioheritage.org/html/profiles/lmco/shearer.htm
128x128johnk
I also recently rediscovered the horn speakers. I had considered them as speakers for nostalgic people, but I think I was wrong. It has a charm that my current speaker doesn’t have. The one I heard was definitely not screaming, but I was not sure if it was as accurate as mine.
That's probably the reason why he put class A Gryphon older reference amp in there - to make digital sound a little nicer. When he puts real analogue source and either full Chord or full Gryphon electronics chain, then I will listen to that system, opportunity permitting.
Until then - sorry, no interest from me. He should get serious, especialy considering what he charges for his speakers. No Danes will fool true American audiophiles.

Sorry, but I believe that's just dogma you're expressing, and nationality is hardly the issue here. The proof is in (the eating of) the pudding, right? And of course, opinion may simply be "at play" where absolutes are stated..
Nationality is always an issue, listen to any Dane but don't ask them. Listen to Americans too.
Even if it is a dogma, it can still be a correct statement.
Nationality is always an issue, listen to any Dane but don't ask them. Listen to Americans too.

Perhaps territoriality is a more fitting term..

Even if it is a dogma, it can still be a correct statement.

It can, yes, but do you consider that to be a benchmark?