Phono/preamp/amp chain. One of them tube the others SS. Which one?


Perhaps any one would do if done right. What would be your preference, generally speaking? Let's assume MC cartridge. This move could be permanent or could be the first step on the way to full tube system. I would probably choose the phono.
inna
Yeah, phono stage should be at least one step ahead until cartridge catches up if ever. In terms of cost that usually means double the price or more.
Post removed 

Different combinations were trialled.

At present my ears are very satisfied & comfortable with the music coming out of the B&W 803D2.

The cartridge: Ortofon MC - Quintet Black

The Phono preamp: SS Bryston BP 1.5

The Preamp: SS Bryston BP26

The Ams: Tube Rogue Audio monoblocks

Bloom - richness & details.

Joseph 



Huge number of choices and vastly different experiences - you will need to test/listen and find the best synergy.

Regarding Shindo - I don't think you will get a better sound than a Shindo preamp MM phono stage with an Auditorium Hommage SUT - at least that Is my experience with highly efficient WLM speakers in a smallish room.

Regarding Rogue phono/preamps - great products. A friend of mine borrowed my realistically priced Tavish design phono stage and I could barely twist it out of his hands, he liked it so much. Look it up - they have a 30 day money back guarantee. I have no ties with this two man tiny company only a very happy customer.

I'm in similar situation. I have a great TT, arm, & MC. Feeds into Mc SS preamp then to Atlas eclipse hybrid amp. Love the tube richness & quietness of the SS preamp/MC phono section. I am leaning toward SS phono preamp for total silence on cartridge output and tube line stage for the sound I prefer further enhanced by my amp. So IMO the absolute silence of a high end SS phono stage trumps the induced bloom of a tubed phono stage, even though I love the tube sound.