Tannoy vs. ATC


I'm looking at ATC SCM40 vs. Tannoy Kensington. Two very different speakers, I know. No.1, I need a speaker that can be placed close to the wall (less than 3 feet). I think both apply there (I didn't say it was ideal). Among other things, I like the Tannoy because I have a 40 w/ch tube amp, and the Tannoy is more "child friendly" (as far as tipping over and access to delicate drivers). The amps also have sentimental value and I would like to use them. If I buy the ATC I have to get other amplification, which I am willing to do because I love what they do (leave the child friendly part to me on this one...!). So, with the 40w/ch tube amp and the Tannoy (which may still require more power), or the ATC with 'competent' SS amplification (TBD), any recommendations on the two? Amps are vintage (and fully functional/restored) McIntosh, currently running Klipsch Chorus speakers (my temporary compromise to allow for Children...hard to push over or destroy!..which actually sound pretty good by the way, just not much in the way of imaging or accurate bass). I have NEVER heard Tannoy Prestige series, but I am going out on a limb based on all the web and print-based anecdotal evidence. Third choice - hold out for Canterbury? Also a factor in the decision, eventually I will be able to use more of the room for placement. My room is 20 x 13 feet. As far as preferences, I like heavy classical music, as well as softer music - classical guitar, choral, etc. (and listenability at low volume is important too). I have found that I do prefer accurate loudspeakers in general, and accurate bass is very important to me (organ music is a staple). I am willing to use a subwoofer. I'm hoping someone might have experience with a lot of this gear. Thanks. 
jimmy2615
Here is a reply that you will love Jimmy2615.
I went from a ATC SCM40 to Tannoy Turnberry SE. It was not an upgrade effort. I just had relocate to a different city so I sold my ATC (with a heavy heart) and bought a Turnberry SE (just took a chance after some auditions). Contrary to what many will tell you, they are more alike than different:

1. They are both very very neutral. Yes, Tannoys are very neutral when driven by good high current amps. But people normally drive Tannoys with more colourful (soulful) tube amps and in the process lose some neutrality and transparency. Drive the Tannoys and ATC with a quality class A amplifier or say something like the ATC SIA-150 and you will hear both of them doing terrific in terms of speed, transparency and tone.

2. The ATC is a bit more neutral to tone but is also drier than the Tannoy. With the Tannoy the timbre is more wet and audible. You can hear a more breathing guitar with the Tannoy whereas ATC will sound more straightforward. To me, Tannoys sound more realistic whereas ATC sounds more accurate (slightly academic in comparison).

3. In terms of dynamics the ATC is amazing. It is more dynamic and effortless than 95% of conventional speakers out there. But Tannoys are partially horn guided and that shows! The Tannoys are even more effortless! Those big drivers do scale and dynamics in a more natural fashion. Those horn guided tweeters bring the bells and triangles more into the room and closer to the listeners, more live I would say.

4. The bass of ATC and Tannoys are different. ATC is drier and punchier, more pistonic. Tannoy is juicier, more wholesome. Kick drums sound more exciting via ATC due to that outright punch, double bass sound more engaging through Tannoy because of the texture and tone which makes it feel more like a real instrument in the room. Just that one needs to understand, while Tannoys sound wonderful with a 30 watt tube amp, if you want it to rock and groove, give it more power like you give the ATC.

5. In terms of outright transparency the ATC is better. The Tannoys on the other hand is more coherent and sounds like a point source more readily because of the concentric drivers. When I moved from ATC to Tannoy I knew the ATC could sound more transparent but the Tannoy was also very transparent so I did not miss the ATC. By the way when I listen to a well setup active ATC I do not miss the Tannoy either. 

6. The Tannoys are more forgiving but they are not coloured. They are just a bit more natural sounding while ATC is a bit more surgical in its approach. But it is really not something to be worried about. ATC is not clinical or surgical in absolute sense. It is only a bit more surgical compared to a Tannoy Prestige. 

Big drivers by law of physics do some things that small drivers cannot do and vice versa. But when well implemented big drivers and small drivers come very close to achieve the same sonic goals of the more realistic music reproduction. Tannoy and ATC are an example of similar convergence.
 
All said and done I would one day like to own a ATC SCM100 active and a Tannoy GRF MK4. They both remain my favourite conventional speakers till date. There are other amazing speakers that I really like  e.g Pioneer Exclusive 2402, Avant Garde Trio Omega, TAD CR1. I may get into these big horn speakers if I leave Tannoy and ATC.

I would suggest you look at the Turnberry GR Limited edition instead of Kensington. Kensington sounds more transparent but it also sounds a bit too bright. Turnberry GR is very balanced. Or you could directly go ahead with Canterburry which is the best of the lot.

On the ATC side, get the 40 active or if it has to be passive then get ATC amplifers to match. Dont try to match amplifiers from other brands which is a pain. I have done that and ultimately found ATC own amplifiers to be an amazing match.

Hoggshead and Pani,  thanks for the all the info !  It is very helpful, indeed.  I was afraid I would not be able to find people with experience with both manufacturers, so is this great.  Pani, what do you think about the Turnberry's ability to fill a room my size compared to the SCM40?  I was concerned it might be on the smallish side; also, I like the height of the Kensington - the Turnberry seems like a must for stands.
No experience with Tannoy but the SCM40 are fabulous. The ATCs do like quite a bit of power. Out of all the stuff we've tried them with so far the Devialet 200 is the favorite. Non-integrated amps then Parasound Halo A21, NAD M22 and the ATC power amp all work well.

We do have a pair of SCM40v2 in Cherry 8/10 condition we are trying to find a new home for. Price is under 5k. You can contact us via our website if you are interested. We're only selling so we can get a pair of the ATC SCM40v2 Actives on display. We also have SCM11 through SCM50 on display here in SF Bay Area.

Nyal / Acoustic Frontiers
If you decide to go the Tannoy route, I have a pair of Canterbury GR that I will be selling. This may be an opportunity to get them for near the Kensington price. The Tannoy works perfectly close to the back wall and has adjustable bass ports and is one of the most dynamic speakers I have heard. Im not a dealer, I just have a pair that I purchased new that I need to sell. A 40 watt tube amp would be perfect. The Canterburys work great with as little as 12 watts and as much as several hundred. They are very beautiful to look at as well. You can contact me here if you are interested/

Jimmy, both ATC SCM40 and Turnberry SE would fill up similar sized rooms. But the Turnberry because of its bigger horn loaded drivers tend to sound fuller and bigger so it will sound more comfortable in a bigger space. Both SCM40 and Turnberry sound very effortless and open overall. More effortless than some very big speakers you will come across. Just that ATC needs 2-3 times more power/current than Turnberry to completely sound free and open and that is why it is highly advised to go with active ATC. Tannoy however will be very happy with 60 solid class A watts.