Jim
I won't hold your being an analogue lover against you. ;)
So, you trust what the sellers say about the cartridges, but don't trust me with a free method? Seriously, how is the improvement of a platter , tone arm, mat, phono cable or phono pre, or isolated motor measured aside from subjectively? How is that not parallel to cables?
Anyone care to explain? I am open to input on this.
Which of our skeptics wish to try Schroeder Method?
Precisely what science is applied in turntable evaluation? What distinguishes it from cable evaluation? What cost structure is defensible for analogue, and why are manufacturer claims accepted uncritically? What is the markup on analogue products relative to cables? Should expensive isolation products be accepted?
I wonder such things as an analogue skeptic. Are there sound (Pun!) Answers?
To me many of the assumptions and methods of analogue, specifically Vinyl, are more tenuous than Schroeder Method.
I won't hold your being an analogue lover against you. ;)
So, you trust what the sellers say about the cartridges, but don't trust me with a free method? Seriously, how is the improvement of a platter , tone arm, mat, phono cable or phono pre, or isolated motor measured aside from subjectively? How is that not parallel to cables?
Anyone care to explain? I am open to input on this.
Which of our skeptics wish to try Schroeder Method?
Precisely what science is applied in turntable evaluation? What distinguishes it from cable evaluation? What cost structure is defensible for analogue, and why are manufacturer claims accepted uncritically? What is the markup on analogue products relative to cables? Should expensive isolation products be accepted?
I wonder such things as an analogue skeptic. Are there sound (Pun!) Answers?
To me many of the assumptions and methods of analogue, specifically Vinyl, are more tenuous than Schroeder Method.