Though making a personal copy of an album one already owns a copy of is something that has been tolerated by music publishers and sound recording owners for personal use (not proliferation), someone running a business that offered such copies could suffer liability, at least under U.S. law.
I suppose a business in the guise of a service, offering to digitize your personal collection, could try to seek some safe harbor by claiming that they were acting in your stead to perform what amounts to making a personal copy. But, that’s not your premise and I wouldn't be sanguine about the outcome.
Laws outside of the US may differ in providing statutory exemptions for personal use copying. Interestingly, a case in Japan where personal copying is permitted rejected the defense of a company offering a scanning service for books to convert them into e-books. See https://the-digital-reader.com/2013/10/04/book-scanning-services-now-illegal-japan/
There is a fair amount of law in the States on copying services that rejected the premise as well.
No legal advice intended here.
That said, there were some very well known ’rips’ circulating at one time.
I suppose a business in the guise of a service, offering to digitize your personal collection, could try to seek some safe harbor by claiming that they were acting in your stead to perform what amounts to making a personal copy. But, that’s not your premise and I wouldn't be sanguine about the outcome.
Laws outside of the US may differ in providing statutory exemptions for personal use copying. Interestingly, a case in Japan where personal copying is permitted rejected the defense of a company offering a scanning service for books to convert them into e-books. See https://the-digital-reader.com/2013/10/04/book-scanning-services-now-illegal-japan/
There is a fair amount of law in the States on copying services that rejected the premise as well.
No legal advice intended here.
That said, there were some very well known ’rips’ circulating at one time.