would B&W work with cheap japanese recievers?


I am trying to upgrade an old Yamaha HT receiver, 85Wx5 with equally cheap speakers.

Don't want to buy an upmarket receiver yet as they generally don't offer HDMI switching. But would like to get started with speakers, like two front B&W 700 series.

Does this make sense? Or should I upgrade the receiver/speakers togethter.
emulex
We ran B&Ws with HK receivers back in the seventies and thought they were a very good match.
I would suggest you upgrade the speakers and keep the reciever. Then if you feel a need for improvement, look into buying a reasonably priced, nice two channel amp (like a used NAD for $300). You can easliy bypass the front two speaker amps in the reciever.
I once had my CDM1's with a Yamaha receiver and thought they sounded fantastic. A/B'd the Yamaha with the Arcam Alpha 10 integrated and heard very little or no difference. A Classe integrated beats them both though.

In your case, I would suggest upgrading the speakers first. Most likely you would hear an improvement since you mentioned you are running cheap speakers. You might want to upgrade the amp at a later stage though when fund permits as the 700 series truly deserve better amplification.
Go for 3 matching fronts.
It will sound awful for theater with junk as the center channel. In 5.1 or 7.1, the center gets the most work.
If you can only get Right and Left now, your next move should be the matching center.
thanks to all for your very good suggestions. I'll definitely pony up for matching fronts. Follow up question.

Will I see meaningful sonic improvements from my Yamaha, for the AV receivers in my price range of 1K-2K, e.g. the Rotels/Adcoms?

My setup is likely to be used 70/30 for video/audio. The primary source material hence will be digital inputs from a $300 Scientific Atlanta HD box or a $500 HD-DVD player. I guess as far as the weakest link theory goes, they are far probably far worse than my Yamaha receiver.