hifiman5, I watched Pauls vid and noticed he did not mention poly material for drivers although as he mentioned speakers are not his thing . - I had read somewhere in the last year or so about the proliferation of polypropylene material drivers and how that material is just not the optimal way to go for reproducing sound. It is though exceptionally cost effective for manufacturers to use poly drivers as they are very easy to manufacture so much so that its practically like using a waffle iron to make the driver material.
Around this time I started reading more and more about Harbeth of which I never paid attention to in the last 15 yrs that I have been immersed in my music listening. Being I buy virtually all my equipment (preowned) without auditioning (it kept me busy although of late I have settled down staying with my current components) I decided to spring for Harbeth 7-es3 monitors (used) which have taken me to a place of spending the most I have spent on speakers.. Harbeth has a lot of good info on driver material and their product on the site . and of course plenty of reviews online. Im glad I did. The most musical I have heard thus far.
I did have an entry level pair of Tekton's quite awhile back and used for a very short time and dont remember anything special about them. Those Tektons of course being very entry level likely do not compare with what is being discussed in this thread.
Back to poly: Im guessing based on my last pair of Decwares that retailed for around 2k and used poly drivers that could be bought for $36 ea online. I know because I was able to find out in order to replace a few that had been damaged in shipment. Another story.
So, I have to wonder how many "hi end " manufacturers are using poly drivers to keep parts cost down when spending a bit more would bring forth better sound. Of course the most egregious example would be speakers costing 5k and up and using poly drivers. To be clear though--its not like they are going to sound awful.. I listened to my MG944's for years and I found no obvious complaint . Just coming from a place of getting more for the money ..
Around this time I started reading more and more about Harbeth of which I never paid attention to in the last 15 yrs that I have been immersed in my music listening. Being I buy virtually all my equipment (preowned) without auditioning (it kept me busy although of late I have settled down staying with my current components) I decided to spring for Harbeth 7-es3 monitors (used) which have taken me to a place of spending the most I have spent on speakers.. Harbeth has a lot of good info on driver material and their product on the site . and of course plenty of reviews online. Im glad I did. The most musical I have heard thus far.
I did have an entry level pair of Tekton's quite awhile back and used for a very short time and dont remember anything special about them. Those Tektons of course being very entry level likely do not compare with what is being discussed in this thread.
Back to poly: Im guessing based on my last pair of Decwares that retailed for around 2k and used poly drivers that could be bought for $36 ea online. I know because I was able to find out in order to replace a few that had been damaged in shipment. Another story.
So, I have to wonder how many "hi end " manufacturers are using poly drivers to keep parts cost down when spending a bit more would bring forth better sound. Of course the most egregious example would be speakers costing 5k and up and using poly drivers. To be clear though--its not like they are going to sound awful.. I listened to my MG944's for years and I found no obvious complaint . Just coming from a place of getting more for the money ..