Interconnects and non-believers

Much better. 👍

Somebody - was it Prof? - mentioned speaker break in.

For what it it is worth, my speakers sound different depending on weather conditions: temp, humidity, air pressure etc

and somebody posted a link to The Cable Cooker. At first I thought it was an Onion thing, then I realized they were serious. 

Gosh, really?

@ unreceivedogma

Somebody - was it Prof? - mentioned speaker break in.

For what it it is worth, my speakers sound different depending on weather conditions: temp, humidity, air pressure etc

and somebody posted a link to The Cable Cooker. At first I thought it was an Onion thing, then I realized they were serious.

https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/the-difficulties-in-component-shootouts

I have a few posts in there that lay out the fundamentals in the logic of this whole mess about ears and hearing, and why science and measurement are still catching up to it.

It's a complex story, not a simple one. That it requires some wide ranging complex data sets to grok the true shape of the question, never mind unraveling the answer from such.

Otherwise these discussions would never take place nor remain unresolved.

Another way of saying that: the longer the complex and unresolved question  has been around.....  the more fundamental the error in the formulation of the question.

teo_audio,

I really like your post in the quoted thread
Especially:

“Those who don’t understand or value those differences either can’t hear it, can’t grok it, or are indulging in their inbuilt capacity to fill in, or can’t separate the mechanism out (like some can) and actually hear the new sound, the new accent, the new micro differences. Ie, they literally are not listening. Literally.”

As you say,  ”Filling in” is most definitely a phenomenon, especially as you get into the music.

I wholeheartedly concur with the entire post.
Really well thought out and presented, without didactic or overblown verbiage!