Grado Platinum VS Dynavector 10x4 MkII

I have had both but unfortunately on different tables. The Dyna on my current Scout and the Plat on my old P25.
To me the Plat a bit lumpy and not as coherent as the Dyna. It still makes beautiful music but the tone of instruments seems exagerated and although pleasant it becomes distracting. Imaging is not as good as with the Dyna as well. Take note though that this "comparison" was done on different tables.
The Dyna was acorss the board more dynamic but never sacrificed tone or PRAT. Both are good carts but at this point it's preference.
Hope that helps
-Vik

I had both on the same table, VPI Jr with Rega RB 300 arm. I much preferred the Dynavector. The Grado was warm and musical, but with no high end it sounded dull and lifeless. The Dynavector bass is leaner, but the high's are there. Not bright, but airy and done very well. I kept the 10X4 mk II, needless to say.

Regards,
John

I've used a number of grados from the gold up to the statement (including the plat, master and reference) on my aries/jmw 10 rig. also have had the dynavector 10x4 mII and it's big sibling the 20x. I completely agree with Vik and John. In fact the 10x4 is one of my favourite carts at any price. call me crasy but it does more for me (just sounds more musical) than the 20x. I am not the only one to say this so maybe I'm not crasy or maybe it's just system dependent). incidently, it was Harry at VPI who strongly suggested I try the 20. I do love the Grado sound, but comparing those two carts I'd highly recommend the Dyna.
J.N. - what phono stage will it be used with?