A certain online retailer asked me for a review of Pangea power cords..


Here is my response                                                                                    
"Way back when the Pangea AC9 was introduced, I bought one. My first aftermarket powercord. I didn't think a powercord could make any difference! Put it on my Forte' 4 amp, and immediately noticed better bass response. I was hooked.Since then I have upgraded everything in my system, but I stick to Pangea power cords.Just last night, listening via Rudistor RPX-33mkII headamp and Sennheiser HD800 (bought from Audio Advisor) I was, beside listening to Deep Purple "Machine Head" checking out some new outlets. And the difference was easy to hear, via the Pangea AC14SE MKII Signature powercord. The Pangea powercrds ARE GREAT, no question. Thanks Pangea dude, for creating them, and thank you Audio Advisor, for offering them to the public. I now listen to my Magnepan 20.7s, Marantz SA-10, Conrad Johnson ACT2, Kuzma Stabi Stogi S turntable. ALL using Pangea powercords.My system is no slouch, neither are Pangea powercords.
If I were to offer one suggestion, Start a line of AC14SE, and AC9SEPangea with pure copper Rhodium plated plugs.and Cryo'ed.
Thanks in advance Pangea Dude! You are a HERO.to all of us who enjoy Pangea power cords."So.. any comments?
elizabeth

Showing 3 responses by ivan_nosnibor

@jhills, 

Digital interference is broadcast both through the air and will also leak bidirectionally from the source, upstream and down.
No it doesn’t take $15k to fix digital. I have $600 ones that do a great job of that (although they are different in that they have passive digital filtering built in them), but, in the nose-bleed territory, as I understand it, it can come down to a cord design that can filter upstream, down and then also filter out its own noise...that, from what I can gather, is something of a holy grail of cord design...and no, it’s evidently not the same thing as ’coming up with a good braid’. Few designs actually ’filter themselves out’ of the equation. Don’t know anything about the one inna mentions, though.
I say in my above post that a cord that can filter itself out is ’something of a holy grail’ simply because if you can design a cord that filters out "ALL noise" (however you define that) downstream and all of it upstream, then all that will remain, is the noise that comes from the cord itself. Once you’ve solved that last step, you’ve (presumably) made an entirely "noise-free" cord. No noise can get in or out.