nonoise,
In regards to what?
You're speaking of yourself, right?
In regards to what?
81 responses Add your response
Wow. This all went sideways rather quickly. 🤔 I like my Blue Jeans cables and would recommend their products. My personal preference is to spend for quality cables but not exotic cables. I also like Dyson Audio products. He will do custom builds and stands by his products. I just bought a WireWorld interconnect and so far it seems to be of good quality. |
I just wanted to correct a bad link I posted. It's http://www.cabledyne.com/ and not cabledynecables. All the best, Nonoise |
They are decent Entry level cables,not much more . Wireworld , Audioquest are good ,Kimber8tc is a classic . supra makes excellent bang for the buck for under $500 for some very good speaker cables, and interconnects very wellpriced. madisound sells them . I use theirwire internally in my new Speakers . I use very well respected Verastarr Audio cables . abithigher pricedthen average But also better resolution . cables can go into the 5 $$ digit category if you want to spend and have the $$. I meet the logic 1/2way on spending. |
I wouldn’t be too sure. To whit, Aerodynamics: The cropped F-22 delta wings generate greater static drag than the MiG-29’s tapered swept wings, there is a good reason they aren’t used on non-stealth fighters. Another major aerodynamic difference is that the F-22 lacks wing root extensions which generate chine vortex over the wing thus greatly increasing lift and reducing drag. The vortex also augments the rudder’s effect at high alpha flight. Both aircraft have abundantly large rudders, but the MiG-29 has larger envelope of controllable flight and better post-stall recovery, as demonstrated by the Cobra maneuver. The MiG-29’s airfoil generates more lift for less drag at high alpha with better stability, has a higher maximum angle of attack and superior stall recover characteristics. Avionics: It’s (the F-22) designed with great faith in stealth, Lockheed prioritized beyond visual range combat capabilities over dogfight performance, thus omitted a helmet mounted sighting system. Thrust vectoring is one feature which does enhance the F-22’s agility and reduce energy bleed, but it seems to be simply super-imposed on the flat exhaust design meant as a stealth measure. The APG-77 provides +/-120° field of coverage in azimuth and elevation, which is the highest possible value for a flat phased array antenna. The original N-010 Zhuk radar has +/- 90° range in azimuth and +55/-40° in elevation. This gives the F-22 some advantage in limit of radar acquisition parameters, but unlike the HMS equipped MiG, the pilot still has to manually point the aircraft within a much smaller parameter to obtain radar lock. 🤗 cheers, from my MIG-29 |
Parts and power? No problemo. “The MiG-29 has been manufactured in several major variants, including the multirole Mikoyan MiG-29M and the navalised Mikoyan MiG-29K; the most advanced member of the family to date is the Mikoyan MiG-35. Later models frequently feature improved engines, glass cockpits with HOTAS-compatible flight controls, modern radar and IRST sensors, and considerably increased fuel capacity; some aircraft have also been equipped for aerial refuelling. Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the militaries of a number of former Soviet republics have continued to operate the MiG-29, the largest of which is the Russian Air Force. The Russian Air Force wanted to upgrade its existing fleet to the modernised MiG-29SMT configuration, but financial difficulties have limited deliveries. The MiG-29 has also been a popular export aircraft; more than 30 nations either operate or have operated the aircraft to date, India being one of the largest export operators of the type. In 2013 the MiG-29 was still in production by Mikoyan, a subsidiary of United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) since 2006.” This just in: “About 1,600 MiG-29s are currently operational worldwide and approximately 600 MiG-29s and variants are in service with the Russian Air Force.” cheers |