Establishing a common analog listening bias


Maybe it is possible to establish a widely accepted common ground in terms of listening bias by choosing and agreeing on 10-30 LPs all readily available new to all audiophiles for decent price.
If all listening tests and personal comments regarding the sound of components and systems in the various threads and posts would refer to any of these LPs mainly, everyones comments and experiences would much easier be understood by their fellow Audiogoners.

How about an "Audiogon baker's double-dozen"?

This would create a solid ground for all of us.

How do you think about this ?
dertonarm

Showing 4 responses by viridian

This is just the type of reductive sentiment that leads to people with $40,000 systems and fifty records. Most of them Diana Krall and Holly Cole. To properly get the feel for a system, the maximum number of records should be used for evaluation and those should be ones that you like. This common ground idea really makes no sense.

To take Pererayer's example of "Something Else", I could be talking about the 45RPM reissue, you could be talking about a first BN pressing, the next person could have a King Super Analog Japanese pressing and someone else could have the 90s digitally sourced reissue. Other than agreeing that this is one fine bit of playing, we are not apt to learn much else. Then again, we could all buy yet another copy and all have the same one, and still no one would agree on anything.
Interesting how many of these suggestions were recorded digitally, the Krause, Eagles, Wasserman, I believe the SRV, as well.
I have already explained it in the fourth post in this thread; no need to endlessly repeat things. I will leave that to others.