Is two Subs better than One?

Baam, BTW I just bought a Stentor III. It is a great sub and used for what you are doing makes sense as you know how your room sounds.

Raul, you certainly are the master of taking one's comments out of context. I did not say " subs is plain and simple stupid".
What I said was cutting off mahler's bass and replacing it with two subs is plain stupid with a speaker like the mahlers. I am sure Baam bought the mahlers as he luvs the full range big dynamic sound, not so he could cut the bass off and replace with $50 digital amps inside two subs.

You have your opinions, I have mine.

Baan is certainly doing the logical thing for his system and setup.

cheers

OK, if you are in the US, where bigger is always better, 2 is better. Anywhere else, depending on room size of course, one well choosen sub is fine.

2 Subs Sound better to me. After all the opinions I thought I would buy a second DD15 Subwoofer. After setting it up but not yet finely tuning it; the volume needed to be decreased to synch with my Wilson 7's. I could definitely sense a fuller better balanced base. The mid and upper frequencies were more focused due to the fact that base appeared to fill the room better. With the base originally localized more to one side, the Wilson midrange on the opposite side did not feel as intergraded.
I guess bigger is better.

how do you hookup 2 subs to a preamp or processor?

I added a ACI Titan II LE as the second sub to my system and I don't think I will ever go back. My room is 13.5 x 17.5 and the second sub just make everything sounds better from 2-ch music to 5.1 HT movies. I'm using Anthem processor which has 2 sub outputs so hook-up is very easy.