Jeff Rowland Aeris and Playback Designs MPD-3

I have not heard the Aeris and I recently purchased the Playback Designs MPD-3. I did quite a bit of research and previously owned a Berkeley Alpha DAC prior to the Playback Designs DAC. One reason I did not consider the Aeris was it tops out at 24/96 sample rate on the USB port, I simply wanted to invest in a DAC that was ready for Hi-REZ.

My Berkeley was VERY good, the Playback is in another league but you should arrange for auditions in this price range. The Playback can receive 24/384 PCM and 1 bit/5.6448mhz DSD(double the sample rate of SACD's) via USB. VERY organic.....all PCM is upsampled to 5.6448 mhz and I use Pure Music on a Mac Mini.

As an aside, I also own a Korg MR2000S studio DSD digital recorder. It will record 16/44 all the way to the 1 bit/5.6448mhz DSD to an internal hard drive. It has truly excellent and smooth sound quality and I am using it to record vinyl. The sound quality of a high quality album played back through the MPD-3 is simply stunning.

Good luck in your search...I'm sure the Aeris is a fine DAC....it would surprise me however if it was a match for the Playback Designs.

Thanks, definitely I would audition the MPD-3 before buying.

The problem is out here the chances of being able to demo these two on the same system are pretty low... hence throwing the question out there.

On a slightly different note, does this mean the Aeris would not be able to process a signal from an SACD transport? Or it would compress sample rate.

Just my 2 cents. I dont see anywhere where the Aeris is a DSD DAC so no, it would not process a DSD stream. I also know of no SACD transport at present that puts out data that can be read by a consumer DAC other than the proprietary offerings by Esoteric or Meitner et al....I think Sony made sure it was next to impossible to legally do so. They had such success with the BetaMax that they simply carried that strategy forward to "insure" the success of SACD.

I believe the SACD physical format is doomed, not because it isnt returning on the promise of better digital but because of the ability to download music from the web in a myriad of sample rates. In my opinion, the widespread ablity to download new music in DSD is just over the horizon. Software development is moving at warp speed and companies like HDTracks is really hustling to bring new releases to market in HiRez. 24/192 downloads are no big deal now and DSD is next as far as widespread adoption by those selling music. It costs a company no more to sell you a DSD download other than more server space and maybe beefing up their bandwidth. Now the big dilemma for the music industry is if they offer you a DSD download, you likely have no need to repurchase the same music over and over....anyone else here buy "Kind of Blue" or "Time Out" more than once LOL? This has been the lifeblood of the industry but that will all be changing soon as artists will be able in 2013 to exercise their "rights of termination" to reclaim their masters. But I digress.

If you are going to invest in a DAC and you must have SACD, look at the MPS-5. I simply believed in my case that the physical media was no longer necessary but the 1 bit DSD was.