mfsl vs. classic records

The LPs that sound best to me are the ones I buy used for a buck or so. They and the $1/$2 CDs ALWAYS sound best.
LOL

I agree with Stevecham and would also add that there have been significant differences within each label's time frame: for example, early MFSLs were pressed by JVC in Japan, then their UHQR and GAIN. Classic Records also went through various vinyl formulations, etc.

I think, subject to someone else with better knowledge, that generally pressing runs were about 5,000 for each/both? companies.

The older MFSL , higher quality virgin vinyl was used and better quality made in Japan manuufacturing. Cheers

I've had pretty good luck with the MFSL label lately, especially the Silver series.

I want to underscore what Elizabeth said above in that, MFSL and Classic aside, many of my favorite LPs are those that were original stock pressings from the 60s, 70s and 80s, that cost me a buck or two in recent years, and that when cleaned up, deliver all the sonic bliss I could ask for.