New York Times article on Beatles and bootlegs

Here is the link:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/27/arts/music/27beat.html?_r=1&scp=2&sq=beatles&st=cse

I read about "Purple Chick" (apparently just a group of obsessed fans) in Rolling Stone here Apparently, their digital remasters of the classic Beatles albums are sonically superior to the studio releases.

A related question; is there any talk of re-mastered reissues in the future or is this not a priority? Couldn't agree more that they could sound better, a lot better. It's a shame that some of these masterpieces are only available in mediocre sound!