reclocking


I heard that asynchronous usb converter is the route to go??
I tried in my system 3 configuration:
Stello U3 +aqvox power supply
bel canto Ulink +aqvox power supply
Bel canto usb link 2496+aqvox power supply+Dip classic
I enjoyed the last configuration more than the two asynchronous.
Something wrong with my ears? or the jitter created in asynchronous device is embedded in the signal and the Dac can't do nothing for reclocking
alfe
Steve...where does jitter occur?

Jitter starts at the master clock in the transport or async USB interface. It then just gets worse as it passes through buffers, translators and cables. The DAC receiver may add more or reduce it a bit. The D/A chip generally adds more.

Is it more likely to come from the transport/music server or from the DAC?

Both have contributions. The worst will be the transport or device that contains the master clock.

Can it be eliminated completely and how would that be done?

Cannot be eliminated completely, but it can be reduced to the point where other system noise and distortion is more prevalent. This is not easy though. One must use very low noise fast-responding power supplies for the master clock and the associated circuitry. This results in tight voltage regulation. Likewise, the D/A chip must have very low noise fast-responding regulation on the supply voltages. DACs without upsampling and with good voltage regulation can delivery a very low jitter result. You generally get what you pay for here.

Alfe - the jitter solution is actually fixed with async USB, but it is highly dependent on the implementation. Most are poorly implemented. There are however other pitfalls that are more difficult to overcome, such as the effect of the playback software and audio stack. Most of these disappear when one uses a network-driven solution such as Sonos or SB, but hi-res is the limitation of these right now.

Cerrot - you continuously complain about the SQ of cheap USB converters and poor designs. This is like buying a cheap CD transport and concluding that all transports are garbage.

There are some high-end reviewers such as JA and Steven Stone that use USB converters for their digital references, and for good reason. They outperform everything else.

Steve N.
Empirical Audio
Alfe - you can see some Async USB and reclocker jitter plots here:

http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=115008.0

Any manufacturer that claims their device (not the clock) delivers 10psec of jitter on S/PDIF are not living on this planet.

Steve N.
Empirical Audio
Steve
Thank you for your explanation.
I'm disc manufacturer and believe me all the masters that we are getting from studios are disaster when it come to jitter and as we say here in france" the nicest girl of the world can't give more than what she has"
Alfe - that is a shame. I dont believe that most mastering studios realize how important jitter is in the A/D. It is expensive to get low jitter in a A/D and the other devices used, like preamps are critical as well. Most studios dont spend enough for this equipment. This seems to be the trend; lower cost garage studios using computers etc..

Once the jitter is in the master, there is nothing you can do to improve this.

I'm a strong believer in capturing the master on analog tape and mixing it analog. Then digitize it.

At lest the playback jitter we can have an effect on. There seems to be no linits to getting it low enough. Evey time I achieve lower measured jitter, I can hear the improvement. Even the difference in sound quality between 50psec and 25psec. Who would have thought?

Steve N.
Empirical Audio