2. misc-audio
  3. 1013029057

TAS new look-the end is near?

Picked up the latest copy of The Absolute Sound a couple of days ago and something just aint right. First I noticed the cover has changed. Gone is the dignified layout- White boardered in a contrasing color. Changed is the subtitle from "The High End Journal of Audio and Music" to "Stereo - Multichannel Audio - Music" ! Flipping through I find bold red printed highlighted quotes between paragraphs in some of the reviews. Then I came accross pages 18-19. FUTURE TAS big orange letters, pictures and arrows and captions and it hit me. Stereo Review! Audio! But not TAS! Even the paper stock seems cheaper. I remember when the cool little "underground" mag grew to full size. Oh well at least the print and pics were bigger. But now the "journal" looks like any mag, no character. Shorter reviews, less critical comment, more watered down praise. Now this! What happened to this sharp edged journal? Does this distub anyone else? PS- if the must change their look they should check out HI-FI+ (GB).
blkadr
natalie
404 posts
 
Its been a RAG for sometime.The old values it was founded on are long gone.
mlg
47 posts
 
Did you notice that Robert Harley has taken over as editor from Harry Pearson? Harley has an article discussing this. Pearson will continue to write his "work shop" and occasional reviews.

I have been a subscriber since issue 13. This may be the end of an era, which is a bit sad.
whatjd
615 posts
 
Couldn't agree more. You might want to look at two prior threads:

1. What was it about Fi magazine?

and

2. The Absolute Sound Review of Sony SCD-XA777ES???

These were threads I had done a few weeks ago..when I
was about to get rid of some old Fi mags..and in looking them over became a little melancholy.,..then,.. wham... I received the new TAS.. Damn, I thought Mr. Dell was going to save TAS, not ruin it.
rcprince
2,830 posts
 
My understanding is they were losing a LOT of money with the old style, even after their initial changes from journal size to the larger format. They're doing what Stereophile did (and what Pearson decried, but in his defense I don't think this was his decision to make) in an effort to increase their circulation. Can't say I necessarily like it (unless their content remains critical and relatively unbiased), but they're not running a charity for us, ya know.
More to discover