We Need A Separate Forum for Fuses

Good one, Moops! You’re firing on all cylinders. 

@douglas_schroeder 

Hope this isn't out of bounds... : )

You are supplying the necessary information for my purposes.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0085-3

^^^ Requires a subscription.

Gives a summary: https://www.mnn.com/green-tech/research-innovations/blogs/army-gamers-just-put-dent-einsteins-spooky...

@geoffkait 
....and the rest of the confused crowd,
By definition, empirical measurements require the use of a commonly accepted scale of some weight or measure. Therefore, no listening test can be empirical. Without some empirical scale, the "listening measurement" (a true oxy-moron) is purely subjective. It could only be objective if there were such a thing as a standardized ear and perception and all conceivable variations controlled for. You people aren't even doing a basic multi-variant analysis, which is the closest you could possibly come to a useful, scientific analysis. 
I'll also take note of the fact nobody has of yet questioned my assertion that susceptibility to the influence of a fuse is a failing of the power supply. 
Carry on with your mischaracterizations, conflating of terms, and misunderstandings....

Empirical evidence as defined by Wikipedia

Empirical evidence, also known as sensory experience, is the information received by means of the senses, particularly by observation and documentation of patterns and behavior through experimentation. The term comes from the Greek word for experience, ἐμπειρία (empeiría).Empirical evidence - Wikipedia

Kosst
Likely nobody has questioned your assertion about the failing of the power supply as nobody really desires any further fruitless and pointless arguements.