Raul/Nandric/Henry Dynavector Karat Nova 13/17 My advice would be to only buy one that is in good working condition, because they cannot be rebuilt. As far as retipping goes, the diamond cantilever has a very fragile yoke into which the stylus is glued. You would need to discuss with Axel the possibility dissolving the glue, as I would imagine that trying to remove the stylus without fracturing the yoke would be difficult. On a Karat Nova 17, you might possibly be able to use a donor diamond cantilever & tip off a standard Karat 17D2. My first Nova 13 went 15 years before I got it rebuilt. I have no idea whether the diamond was worn, it still sounded good, and no problems with the suspension. I simply decided to get it rebuilt to keep it in top condition. Unfortunately I dropped it ( Naim Aro, no arm lift ) and broke the yoke at the end of the cantilever. Dynavector rebuilt it a second time for me. The other one is still original, has been used off and on, and sounds fine.
Hope this helps.
PS Raul - yes the serial nos are on the metal plate, so you have 2 original 13's. If one has a higher output then it has probably been rebuilt with a Nova 17 motor. |
Well I guess I'm lucky, as I bought the NCG 25 years ago. 22 years ago the NCG was PCG for me as I acquired 2 OMG's. I say to Raul keep on going, keep up the good work, so far I've saved $1000's. I hope Raul can get to my OMG before I expire so I can RIP.
|
Timeltel - I use the Naim grounding scheme, which essentially is only use 1 outlet ( to get grounds as close together as possible ), and sequence the components into the wall starting with power amp and concluding with source. This lowered the noise floor considerably, even eliminating some noise from a video player further down the mains line. With regard to turntables, my preamp is star earthed and has a separate power supply. What I have done is put additional earth posts on the preamp power supply. This means I can star earth the turntable/motor/motor controller etc separately & directly back to the preamp power supply rather than through the front end of the preamp. This seemed to be beneficial. In my experience with TT's/arms/motors etc it is usually trial and error to get best results as many TT's have inconsistant grounding schemes between platter/motor/controller. |
Timeltel - if you ran the Signet MM through the Denon HA1000 headamp, I assume you ran the MM bypass. I cant see how this could improve the sound unless there is an active buffer at 0db, or it is altering the loading that the cartridge sees, fortuitously. I would have expected a decline in transparency due to the extra cable and connectors, but possibly a change in spectral balance. |
Timeltel - before you put the big S in front of the crap, I have found it can take several months for old gear that has not been used for a while to run in, caps to reform etc. For determination of best polarity, the Goldmund methodology was to measure all equipment, plugged in and turned on, but with interconnects removed. Start at the power amp and work back to source. Simply measure the voltage between signal chassis and ground, reverse the wall plug, remeasure and select the lowest voltage difference for the optimum orientation for each component. You correct each component as you go. As you have stated there is a big difference when all components have been optimised for polarity. I prefer to change the transformer inputs around inside the component, so that the mains fuse remains in the phase line. |
Raul re Japanese solid state design - considering the boards for laser guided missiles come out of Japan, I would assume they have some capability in designing competent electronics. There have been many high end SS products built in Japan that have never been seen in the west. Examples are the Final Audio Grangust preamplifier, US25,000 in the early eighties, the Audio Devices AD-C1 preamp US$31,000 in the late eighties. There are many others, so we cannot really exclude these folk from the pantheons of high end audio design from what we have seen distributed outside of that country. |
Timeltel - You should be able to convince someone to pay an extraordinary sum of money for the HA-1000. The value proposition would be - "For the princely sum of $1000 someone will learn never to invest in old solid state gear. The future savings from not repeating this foolhardiness will save $1000's - providing a very handsome return on the initial investment." Failing that, for a small donation I could write a glowing review of the HA1000 and post it on the forum, prior to you listing it on ebay. Of course if you were Ivor T you would argue it is the best head amp in the world, you just haven't found the right cartridge yet. |
Nandric - I think you are right. The different cantilevers have different characteristics in terms of stiffness, natural dampening and resonance. I suspect that putting ruby cantilevers for example in a cartridge that hasn't been designed for it is courting disaster, at best a lucky dip. |
Heaps of Ruby/diamond/Sapphire/Boron cantilevered cartridges available in the 80's, probably more than today. Sumiko Talisman Boron, Sumiko Talisman Sapphire sold in the 1000's/Kiseki Sapphire/Zenn Ruby/Dynavector Ruby & Diamond to name a few. Cartridge types - Stax electret condensor using fets, Toshiba - fet cartridge, also remember listening to Peter Suchy's Clearaudio with the built in phono stage at the headshell in the late 80's. Then there's the Audionote IO with the DC powered electromagnet's. Strain guage - yep dozens of those
Not much new really over the past 30 years.. |
the difference between RBCD via the Oppo and a top quality LP via a great cartridge, tonearm, and turntable, is not in bandwidth, distortion, noise floor. Obviously, digital kills vinyl on all of those measurable criteria. That statement is not correct 1. Digital is 20hz - 20khz, analogue has a wider bandwidth than this. 2. Distortion - well thats debatable. One could argue since all digital is a calculated approximation based on sampling that none of it is correct. This comes back to what is your definition of distortion. 3. Noise floor. There is an argument that you can hear into the noise floor with analogue, whereas digital just chops off below the noise floor. If this argument is accepted then analogue can have a wider dynamic range. What I find most perplexing about digital is that I have heard an Ipad blow off many 10-12k digital front ends. How can this be ? What message does this send about spending big money on digital. |
|
Raul - whilst I regard your cartridge comparisons as invaluable, I do wonder how well your analogue is running. I have a friend with a Technics SP10 will all the mods being touted around this forum, $15k arm/cartridge, and another with bog standard Micro RX5000 ( with air bearing )/$10k arm/cart - the Micro is in another league - particularly in terms of high frequency purity and extension. There is no loss of drive compared to the Technics. I also have another friend with both the Acoustic Plan and an SME20 - again the SME20 is a significant step up from the Acoustic Plan. The Denon DP100 compared to my Final Audio auditioned in the same system compresses dynamics and overloads with complex music - its coloured. So in my experience the Micro should be the best of what you have, but obviously you disagree. |
Raul et al - back in the late 80's I imported and sold the Talisman Alchemist, Virtuoso and Shinnon Red's. They are all quite good. I ran the Alchemist with a Syrinx arm for a couple of years and it sounded sharp, incisive and musical. The Virtuoso - there were 2 versions - a Boron and the Dti. These were both a cut above the Alchemist. They sound quick and lively with out usual gunge of high output MC's. The Sumiko Bluepoint are quite disappointing to my ears compared with these older designs. Actaully they are unlistenable - I put a hammer through my Bluepoint as I was not prepared to even give it away. |
I have an open mind, but I also have to ask why bother, since we have identified so many other wonderful cartridges already, and I regard it as unlikely that either of these two is transcendent. An oxymoron if ever I saw. I too have an open mind, I live on the other side of the flat earth.. As regards the lack of trust on some reviewers, yes I could agree in some instances, you may be right, but my shrink told me to bury them at wounded knee and since then my system sounds much much better.. I think. |
There are still some undiscovered nuggets to be found. I would recommend a Shure M95ED. (If you have fat fingers the M95ED cartridge has the added bonus of the Side-Guard Stylus Protection System which responds to accidental side thrusts on the stylus by withdrawing the entire shank and tip safely into the stylus housing before damage can occur). If you want something a little better try the GRADO DJ-200. This is a DJ cartridge based on the Prestige series and stylus replacement is $120/pr. If you want to go more European, the latest buzz amongst the EMT fanatics is the Tonar Baktrak DJ Mix phono cartridge, a conventional mounting version of their famous Tonar Banana DJ Disco phono cartridge. These are genuine giant killers that will annihilate any moving coil, moving magnet and moving iron up to $10k and beyond. My personal favourite - the Tonar Baktrak with a nice new spherical stylus from the Expert Stylus Co - this will leave the Technics EPC100 Mk6 Revised in its berylium dust. To match the excitement of a quality moving coil, load the MM's at 75k and put some extra capacitance on the phono input ( about 400pf should be enough ) - this will bring the top end up nicely as well as add a little sheen to the upper mid lower treble. Now put some Dame Joan Sutherland on, believe me the moths and mosquitos wont come inside at night even if you leave the lights on and the doors open.... |
Trackability and MM vs MC This discussion brings to mind the most common mistake I see in these forums. How often do we see the question asked "whats the best cartridge under $2000 for my Rega/Project/...?" The old maxim from the 80's analogue era "A $500 cartridge on a $2000 tonearm will invariably sound better than a $2000 cartridge on a $500 arm" seems to be largely forgotten or ignored today. Back in the 80's I saw well respected tonearms come back with knackered bearings within 6 months after the owners fitted a low compliance LOMC. I lost count of the number of times I saw folk try and run a Koetsu or similar on an Rega RB300 for example, and wonder why a cheapy MM on a Zeta, Alphason or SME will actually sound more musical and track better. |
The Highphonics have very very low output (0.12). They are very arm sensitive and phono sensitive, so I suspect it suits Dgob's solid state phono. Ex Denon engineers, has some semblance to the Denon DL1000. They need a very high gain, best I've heard was with a custom built phono using Burr-Brown op amps ( research samples, not available to manufacturers or public, very low noise ) and a non standard RIAA curve - corrected for usual problem of cutter head amplifiers not providing the correct cutover points. Quick and dynamic, provided preamp has the gain, in my experience but a little thin. Dgob, fyi the Dynavector 501 with its high horizontal mass pulled more solidity and bottom end out of the Highphonic, despite the low tracking weight and low mass of the cartridge. I get the same effect with the Shure V15vmr & vxmd on that arm. I also have the Glanz MF61 to hand and would expect the Highphonic to dig a little deeper and sound more "unconstrained", a lot more open through the midrange in particular, from my experience. |
Nandric, The Jasmine phono uses J-farts to amplify LOMC's, giving the MC input 70db of gain exclusive of line stage gain. I find them a little too coarse and noisy for my taste. With cartridges around 0.12mv unless you have very high gain, clean and noise free, in my experience dynamics are usually compromised, even if there is sufficient gain.
With regard to cantilever materials, in my experience Boron cantilevers do tend to sound more natural than diamond cantilevers, however, one needs to consider the context in which the materials are used. The diamond cantilevered Dynavector Nova 13D that I have has balls down low so I am not sure how this fits your gender association model. The Dynavector reference system in Japan in the 80's on which the Dynavector cartridges of the day were developed was ruler flat to well below 20hz.
I do agree on the Kisekis. A friend had the entry level Bluespot, and despite being 7-8 years old at the time, it sounded better than many more modern MC's. It could be that the Sony X88D that you have is past it's sell by date as it was highly regarded by a friend of mine who reviewed it for TAS in the 80's along with the Highphonic MCR5, Denon DL1000, Stax ECP & Accuphase AC2 cartridges and concluded it was superior to these other cartridges by a considerable margin.
Dgob, fyi, at the time then SAEC 407/23 arm was very popular and recommended by Highphonic for the review. This combo sounded thin. However the Audiocraft MC3000 fleshed out the Highphonic. Use of dampening on the Audiocraft made the sound more diffuse and was eschewed. Adding mass around the Audiocraft pivot point to load it up enhanced the soundstage focus and dynamics. |
Jcarr - The Sony my friend Warwick Mickell reviewed for TAS in 1983 was described as X88D, not XL88D. Warwick, who was living in Japan, was loaned the cartridge directly from Mori. He describes a precariously long cantilever (diamond) that made him extremely nervous. Do you think the "X88D" was a typo ?? |
Lewm, why not try an EAR834 - cheap and cheerful and ripe for modification if you feel like it. In standard form it has a very easy sound - very musical. |
Lewm et al, I spent an evening listening to the Soundsmith strain gauge cartridge when Peter visited New Zealand. From memory we listened to the Voice, then the Sussuro and finally Peter put on the Strain Gauge. My impression of the cartridges were quite positive - the moving irons were grain free and had a very easy sound. The strain gauge cartridge with the matching phono was even more grain free, almost eerily so. Peter stated that the strain gauge output approximated an inverse RIAA and that you could almost play it with a straight high gain input ( no RIAA ). However he did not not recommend this. The only thing I found odd with the Soundsmith strain gauge was that when I asked him about stylus replacement, he demonstrated how to, and I was quite surprised that it seemed to be held in by magnetism, which left me wondering about what effect this has on the sound. Same with the blue led light - I would have thought this could affect sound quality from such a small signal. My overall impression was a very grain free and pure sound, but from what I heard I did not get an impression that these had the speed of say a Decca, Ikeda or top flight MC..
|
|
07-13-14: Fleib At the end of this MC survey there are 5 amplitude plots. www.fastaudio Is the classic rising high end part of the appeal? This may well be the essence of the thread - does one prefer the "rising high end" of a moving coil, or does one prefer the rolled off high frequency and phase problems of the moving magnet. As I understand it moving magnets have an electrical resonance within the audio band which results in a rapid rolloff of high frequencies and also phase non linearities within the audio band. Moving coils have an electrical resonance above the audio band. The rising high frequencies in a MC can be damped, but this will be at the cost of phase non linearities - so you take your choice, nothings perfect. Some folk may be more sensitive to phase non linearities and others rising or falling frequency response, so their choice of cartridge probably reflects that. This may well be determined by either or both of ones listening preferences and system, or even long term listening biases. With regard to your generalisation of rising top end MC's I note that in your post dated : 07-05-14: Fleib This is a group test from '06. There are amplitude plots for Clearaudio Concerto and VDH Grasshopper 3. You have omitted the graph for the following - Koetsu Black,which apart from a 1db dip at 10k has no rising high end Allaerts MC1B MkII which has a high frequency falloff My Dynavector Nova 13D is up 1 db at 20k and my Koetsu Black is flat at 20k. To all intents and purposes the top end is no more prominent than either of my Shure V15vmr & vxmr or Glanz MFG61. |
Jcarr Thank you for the informative post. I am interested in your view on cantilever flex on eccentric records. My experience with a tangential air bearing tone, the Eminent Technology ET2, is that even with the horizontal mass reduced significantly by using a totally decoupled counterweight ( in the horizontal plane ) I can observe the cantilever flexing back and forth as the arm moves in and out. I have observed the same phenomena with conventional pivoted arms including my Naim Aro, Dynavector 501 and FR64. An argument has been put forward that because the frequency of oscillation navigating the eccentric record is so low, that the cantilever and arm move as one and the cantilever does not flex. Kuzma uses this for his rationale on employing a very high mass arm. Bruce Thigpen has stated this would defy physics. My own physical observations with low compliance MC's ( Koetsu Black, Denon 103 Garrott among others suggests lateral flex occurs when playing eccentric records. What is your view or experience on this. |
08-20-14: Nandric This also imply that I disagree with Dovers 'theory' that MC carts are prefered by persons who like 'exaggerated' (+ 3 dB at 20 Khz ?) I have never said that and do not subscribe to that theory. |
08-21-14: Nandric Dear Dover, See Dover 07-13-13: ''the essence = does one prefer the 'rising high end' of the MC carts or...'' Nandric, that was a proposition, not a personal view, for the purpose of discussion. If you read the post in full I pointed out that not all MC's have rising top end. Indeed my Koetsu Black ( current model ) has no rising top end and my Dynavector Nova 13D is only 1 db up at 20kh. I suspect that the ensuing step up device or phono stage probably generates more variation in ones perception of top end than the actual cartridge, hence the wide variation in opinions on said same cartridge in many instances. Same with tonearm and its set up, the impact on the cartridges "sound" or sonic signature is significant in my view. |
Fleib - It is interesting to note that the high frequency 2db rise at 20k with the Grace F9 is greater than any of my moving coil cartridges ( Dynavector Karat Nova 13D, Koetsu Black ). Certainly the F9E I owned with original stylus was a little thin and anaemic sounding, a bit wiry in the top end. Lewm, The Dynavector 505 manual I have simply says the sub arm should be parallel, the word geometry is not used. It may simply be that they believe all Dynavector cartridges should be parallel to record for optimum VTA. One possibility is that the damping imparted by the dynamic tracking force spring may be suboptimal when the arm is not level. The Dynavector 501 manual I have does not make any comment, nor does the 507. |
Fleib, Thanks for posting the link to the article on phase response in MC's/MM's. It does go a long way to explaining differences of opinion, listing preferences and system attributes will play a significant role. Here is an interesting video that highlights similar issues around phase preservation, and its impact on sound reproduction - although the video is 20 minutes it is well worth a look. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgK87tmRVeY |
Lewm, a few years ago local distributor found a cache of NOS Denon 103D's in their warehouse. I went through all of them examining their supplied measured response graphs. None of them were the same, and I was able to pick one that had the most accurate response and best channel separation. The variance was quite noticeable between samples. |
05-25-15: Pryso Lew, one possible exception regarding what "specs" tell us. Most MC cartridge specs show a rising high end, often above 15K. Some perceive that as added detail, others as objectionable brightness.
I believe that may be a basic difference between those who prefer MC and the many on this thread that found listening pleasure with MM or MI models. Pryso - this is a gross generalisation and I think most participants in this thread are looking beyond that paradigm. In my case a have no aversion to MM's or MI's. I ran Shure V15V's in an Eminent Technology ET2 tonearm for a number of years and currently own a Glanz MFG61 and Victor X1 ( original with beryllium cantilever and shibata diamond ). I also own Dynavector Nova 13D, Koetsu Black, Denon 103D, Fidelity Research FR1mk3 & Ikeda Kiwame MC's. Both the Dynavector and Koetsu Black Goldline have a flat measured response and a lower published resonant peak than the Victor X1. In my system the Dynavector Nova 13D simply digs deeper than the Victor & Glanz - for example on massed choral work I hear clearly separated individual voices with variations in vocal tone and nuance on each voice, whereas the X1 simply does not have that level of resolution. The Koetsu Black is roughly on about a par with the X1, though a little smoother across the spectrum. In my view there are more serious challenges in amplifying moving coils - ringing in MC Transformers, Granularity in FET/Transistor MC gain stages and noise in all-tube MC gain stages. Similarly tonearms have a significant impact on the performance of individual cartridges. I have run most of my cartridges through multiple arms including Eminent Technology ET2, Naim Aro, FR64S & Dynavector 501 (all currently owned ) and SMEV, Alphason HR100, Zeta and a few others previously owned. I hear bigger differences between arms than between cartridges in the same arm in some cases. For MM's there are clearly big differences in perceived performance due to the impact of loading ( both capacitance & resistance) that many modern phono stages simply do not provide. In my view one can only get a semblance of understanding from a description on this thread of how a cartridge could sound if one can see arm/phono and the rest of the system, otherwise it is meaningless. Cartridge performance is very much a sum of the parts generated outcome. For the record I currently have running two turntables - Final Audio VTT1/Naim Aro/Dynavector Nova 13D ( this is my reference deck ) Platine Verdier (modded)/FR64S/Victor X1 & Koetsu Black Goldline in rotation. I also listen regularly to an Soundsmith Paua Moving Iron and Ortofon Rohmann MC, both are musically compelling and enjoyable to listen to. |
I have both the Glanz MFG61 and the Victor X1 with the original Beryllium cantilever/Shibata stylus. From my testing thus far the Glanz 61 is smoother in the top end and more refined than the Victor X1. I have not heard the Glanz Halcro refers to above and cannot comment on those. The X1 on my Platine Verdier/FR64S has a similar balance to my Koetsu Black, but is etched through the mids and a little brittle in the top end. The Koetsu sounds more relaxed and is more refined. The MFG61 mounted on a FR64S on my Final Audio VTT1 is much smoother and more refined than the X1, sounds like you are sitting a few rows further back in the hall. |
Lewm - short answer is I don't know because the Glanz MFG61 came in the original packaging minus the specs sheet. I ran the Glanz MFG61 in the FR64S with a light headshell and 170g counterweight to lower the effective mass as much as possible. Cantilever looked reasonably stable and centred in this set up. I also run the X1 with the 170g counterweight on the FR64S which was an improvement over the standard counterweight. If the Glanz MFG61 sounds better in a low mass arm than what I experienced then it would be an extraordinary cartridge. |
|
Lewm - There is no great controversy here, just different opinions. Headshell leads include both wire and connectors so any differences are not just due to wire material, but also the gauge, winding, length & connectors. I hear significant repeatable differences in testing. As regards vintage components they all fit a pecking order in some way. For example the quality of transformers is more due to design and winding technique ( technique, tension and lay etc ) than "age". Did you know some winders used to beat the copper wire with a mallet before winding in the old days, doubt anyone does that now. Valves are another example - does anyone today hand grind the grids and match the internal wires to minimise distortion like they used to in the old days, metallurgy and the chemical compositions are much changed today in tube manufacturing. Some paper and oil caps may be better than average quality polys in some applications - remember these have difference electrical properties due to construction. Obviously there may be tradeoffs with old components.
Don’t be too assumptive on old components - I use some vintage 50’s Altec transformers on one of my cartridges - and was surprised to find that the interleaved windings in these 50’s trannies have teflon layers. I have 2 Marantz 7 tube preamps, one original and one completely rebuilt with modern components. The latter is a considerable improvement. Having said that the original is quite capable of seeing off my old Klyne System 7 phono, supposedly one of the best solid state phonos around. As an aside, both Saul Marantz and Sid Smith used modified Marantz 7’s in their own systems - for me it is not heresy to mod these vintage components.
|
Halcro Today I mounted the XL-88 in my FR-64s on the Victor TT-101 running through the Halcro MC phonostage and my jaw dropped at what I heard. This may just be the best sound I have yet heard in my system...😎 Halcro Back in April on the DD thread I mentioned that the Sony XL88D was one of many cartridges used in a comparison of my Final Audio VTT1 (mine, the one I own) and the Denon DP100M (borrowed for a few months). I'm talking about TT's actually on hand, not some third party reviewer. You said at the time halcro OP 04-10-2017 2:40pm Dover- without him actually saying it....I don't think Thuchan is that impressed with the DP100M. I DO know that it doesn't get much listening time amongst his enviable collection, so your description of its sound is believable....although I wouldn't necessarily use those two cartridges as a gauge. I have them both...😎 Do you have the XL88D ( diamond cantilever and stylus cut from one piece ) that I was referring to, or the substantially cheaper XL88 ? |
Halcro Thanks for the update - the XL88 you have has a composite cantilever comprised of beryllium, aluminium & carbon finer - same as was used in the Madrigal Carnegie that I used to sell. Its a good solution. I suspect part of the advantage on the XL88D due to the stylus and cantilever being cut from one piece - there is no joint between stylus and cantilever. The XL88D was far more resolving than the other top cartridges of the day. For that particular reference system ultimately my Dynavector Karat Nova 13D was selected as the cartridge of choice, again Diamond cantilever, although the Nova 13D stylus is glued. I have had and sold cartridges with Sapphire, Ruby, Diamond, Boron and various composite cantilevers - to me the material choice is an intrinsic part of the overall cartridge design.The resonances from the stylus & cantilever are part of the design process when designing and building the generator motor, coil layout & body etc of the whole cartridge. For example on the Shure V15vmr & vxmr that I own the Beryllium cantilever was very much critical in achieving the response and performance the Shure designers wanted. The Glanz MFG61 that I own has a boron cantilever - its the best MM I have heard in my system thus far.
|
Halcro I have similar experiences. We used to sell the Sumiko Talisman range, same cartridge different cantilevers - Standard - Magnesium/Aluminium alloy cantilever/Elliptical Styli Talisman B - Boron tube / Line Contact - nude mounted Talisman S - Sapphire tube / Line contact - laser mounted in ascending cost/price.
The Boron/Sapphire a step up in resolution, but smaller difference between the Boron/Sapphire - the Sapphire slightly lighter, more ethereal in presentation. We did get a few retipped with Microscanner styli by Garrotts which unleashed a little more. According to the blurb ( I have a couple here ) Sapphire is harder than Boron and specs out with a slightly more extended hf response. I've never placed the MFG61 in the Glanz line up so I can't compare it to the other Glanz'. In my system the MFG61 is very neutral with good transparency, the Victor X1 with original Beryllium cantilever and shibata stylus sounds quite coloured by comparison. Also with the MFG61 I dont lose that sense of speed compared to my favourite MC's. The only caution I would give you is the cantilever is a low rider - possibly the suspension is not durable and they are virtually impossible to find.
|
Raul, What evidence do you have that the JVC X1's are any different from the Victor X1's. Are the specifications different ? Given the age of these cartridges they most likely are not up to spec anyway and sample to sample variation could easily account for any differences you may have imagined. For what its worth I have an original Victor X1 with the original Beryllium cantilever and Shibata tip. There is no spec difference between the JVC X1 and Victor X1 (first version, not the mkII ) . The Jico Shibata replacement sounds nothing like the original Beryllium/Shibata. The original stylus produces a quicker faster vastly more transparent sound than the Jico replacement. The Jico replacement is thicker through the midrange and rolled off top and bottom compared to the original Victor stylus.
|
@halcro All their P77 cartridges had the raised lettering DYNAMIC COIL cast with the plastic body. Not so. The Garrotts first P77 was the Cambridge based version with Weinz Parabolic. This was produced when Brian & John first started their re-tipping business with the Weinz diamond. Then they introduced the 2nd version of the Garrott P77, the "Dynamic Coil" version with their own design mods. The 2 versions of the P77 produced by the original Garrott Bros are radically different in sound - the Dynamic Coil version having a much more expansive and dynamic midrange than the first. comparing the sound we hear with our two samples, is mute. I assume you mean "moot" or was this a Freudian slip ! |
@halcro I suspect @chakster 's P77 is the original. It is not that rare - I have seen many samples that look identical to Chakster's P77 in Europe, US & here in New Zealand. It could also be the early P66 with the early P77 stylus.
Now in terms of stylus the early P77 used the Weinz sourced Parabolic. These were superb and underwent a time consuming triple polishing process specifically for the Garrotts. Weinz died in 1980 and at some stage the Garrott's ran out of original Weinz Styli. They managed to get the Weinz shape copied in Japan - probably by Namiki. Here is the official description from the 2nd version "Dynamic Coil" P77 - "GARROTT GRAIN-ORIENTED MICROTRACER PARABOLIC STYLUS".
I know that in the mid 80's when I was a dealer they were offering both the "Weinz Parabolic" and the new "Microscanner" ( also known as "Microridge" ) from Namiki contemporaneously for retips. The Microscanner had the ridge around the bottom, the Parabolic did not, so their description MICROTRACER PARABOLIC in the official blurb for the 2nd version of the P77 is misleading, but probably means that it was the Namiki sourced parabolic ( Not a microscanner profile )..
Garrott's had strong views on matching tip profiles and cantilever materials to specific cartridges. For example Brian built me a custom Denon 103 with Boron cantilever and Weinz Parabolic tip - refused to put a Microscanner on this cartridge.
They also tweaked cartridges whilst retipping - for example Koetsu's "worst built cartridge in the world" were often tweaked internally. The motor assemblies in stone bodied Koetsu's in the 80's for example were held in by paper shims, which were usually eliminated by Garrotts but they did not advertise these tweaks/mods.
|
@halcro And in @chakster s 2nd photo above the stylus assembly is from the P66 ( black body ). It is not a Microtracer as described on the packaging. https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/qBQAAOSw~SdbaWSA/s-l1600.jpgProbably someone upgraded a P66 to a P77 and stuffed the P66 stylus into the P77 packaging. |
@chakster I have never heard the current P77i, only the first 2 iterations from the original Garrott Bros. Halcro I think has both old and new.
@nandric I'm not sure I know enough for a full history, but I could consider adding Reto into the story. Perhaps you could send me your Magic Diamond cartridge so that I can spend a couple of years contemplating that prospect.
Indeed both the Garrott Bros and Reto were and are true artisans, both with wide ranging engineering skills beyond cartridge design.
|
@j2d2 @lewm Don’t think the Einsteins Choice suits MM cartridges, too much gain and low impedance input. ( Highest input impedance is 470ohms or 940ohms in balanced mode. ) The only possibilities I can see for that phono would be the Soundsmith & Grado low output MI cartridges. The Soundsmith low output MI’s generally pan out at around 470 ohms for best sound. |
|
So I guess I didn't spell it out clearly enough for some -
T H E "E I N S T E I N T U R N T A B L E S C H O I C E" IS A MOVING COIL ONLY PHONO STAGE.
THE ONLY POSSIBLE CARTRIDGES THAT IT COULD RUN OTHER THAN LOW TO MEDIUM OUTPUT MOVING COIL PHONO CARTRIDGES WOULD HAVE TO BE LOW OUTPUT.
THE INPUT LOADING AVAILABLE ON THE EINSTEIN TURNTABLES CHOICE HAS A MAXIMUM OF 900 OHMS.
THE ONLY NON MOVING COIL THAT I AM AWARE OF THAT WILL SUIT THIS PHONO STAGE IS THE SOUNDSMITH PAUA - LOW OUTPUT AND RECOMMENDED LOAD 500-1000 OHMS.
I HAVE PERSONALLY HEARD THE SOUNDSMITH PAUA AND IT IS VERY GOOD.
THE GRADO STATEMENT AND TOP WING LOW OUTPUT MM/MI CARTRIDGES BOTH REQUIRE 47K LOADING AND WOULD NOT BE OPTIMUM WITH THIS PHONO STAGE.
|