Hi Tom, "www.phonocartridgeretipping.com/index.html"
I have just received a LOMC cartridge that has been repaired (suspension refreshed), by this retipper. He goes by the name of Andy and I can conferm that he does excellent work. My Blue Oasis (cartridge be Sao Winn of Winn strain-gauge fame), had become rather bright sounding. I suspected hardining of the damper. The following quote is from the reply I received from Andy " I presume you will need it's damper and coil readjustment, -- (here, coil means the thin wire holding cantilever, so that cantilever stays straight with flexible movement, your Benz Micro repaired in Germany had this problem). Presuming diamond tip is still in good condition, the repair cost is $100 + 10 (return shipping)."
The repair turned out to be just as he had suspected, and the cost was as the estimated. Excellent work and the cartridge sounds exactly as I remember it when it was performing at 100%. Turn around time was 22 days to my mailbox. He is only a couple of hundred miles from where I live so he will become my go to retipper. Funny how alot of these retippers have a watch/clock repair backround. Highly recommended! Regards, Don |
Halcro,
When the moderators say "intruder", are they refering to a virus/trojan, spam, or something on that line? Regards, Don |
In shore,
I wonder if when you mount the cartridge into the suspect headshell, you are (unknowingly), twisting the cartridge body and making some kind of ground effect inside of the cartridge body? Have you tried the cartridge in some other headshell? Regards, Don |
In-Shore,
Something esle you just might check. I have just discovered one of my arm wands has a loose wire at the junction of the female clip/pin location. I discovered it doing just what you had described. Reinstalling a arm wand with a known working cartridge that was previously attached, only of find out that one chanel was dead. Mine was the blue wire (left ground), from the arm wand. Did a continuity test (of the arm wires), and discovered it. Gently twisted and pushed it back into the clip and all is now fine. Regards, Don |
To all,
Great buy on what is a rebranded Ortofon Digitrac OM 20.
Ebay number=== 271116407270
Regards, Don |
Hi Dgob,
I have 2 of the 420's. One never taken out of the box. Did he say what was revamped? I would asume a cantilever/stylus change but to what. Would I just ask for Dgob's conversion? Regards, Don |
My dear Balkan friend,
I for one also have a "exit strategy". The problem is I am finding it quite difficult to control the "just one more desire". I must admit, it is a capitalist consumption curse. My cartridge resell will be a complete failure as far as selling for profit is concerned. Loss control is where I am at now. I'm at a point where every M/M cartridge I do a cantilever/stylus change on, will only raises that cartridge up to the level of several other cartridges I already have at best. Just "burning money" is an old saying that comes to mind. Yes, I do have a spare 420 that I could offer to Axel for the "Dgob transformation". Do I really need another also ran? But then I ask myself, what if the cartridge (in its new configuration), actually raises the bar? Lets find out just what Axel did to the Acutex 420. Then, well, lets see how strong my "exit strategy" really is. Deepest Regards Comrade Don |
Hi Dgob, Would never have thought to look in the Glanz thread to read about the 420. Thanks, Regards, Don |
Raul,
Are you still running your phono stage at 100K? The Pickering XVS 5000 was a CD4 Quad cartridge. Pickering probably use the top (cherry picked), stylus to extent the fequency responce flat out to 50K for CD4 playback. The Stanton 981s only needed a stylus that would play flat out to 20K. You got yourself the best of the best as far as stylus profile. Simply as that! Regards, Don |
Hi Lewm, "where does the XVS5000 fit in the scheme of the 4500 and 7500 cartridges? Was it a special model specifically for 4-channel LPs?"
Your statement is a somewhat loaded question. I conceder this cartridge line (the XSV), "a special" line of cartridges. The 2nd part of your question can be answered this way. There was no cartridge manufactured "just" for Quad. They would all play and was designed to play standard 2 cannel stereo but in addition would play the extended frequency 4 channel tracks. I believe there was only one additional XSV above your 4500 and it was the 5000. Your 7500 IIRC is a XLZ. The XSV line started at 3000 and went up as the stylus profiles improved. The 5000 being the best. There is a guy by the name of Richard Steinfeld (ex Stanton employee), who has written a handbook titled "The Handbook for Stanton and Pickering Phonograph Cartridges and Styli who can be contacted at rsteinbook@sonic.net The handbook is full of information about the history of the 2 cartridge manufacturers and all the various cartridges and styli that was provided to the public during the Golden Years of analog. Amazing read if you are a Stanton/Pickering fan which I certainly am one of! Highly recommend you get yourself a copy. Regards, Don |
|
Raul,
I own both the 981s. The LZS and the HZS. I also own the Stanton Epoch II LZ8S. It's also a contender. I only have 1 D98s styli. It came mounted on the NOS LZS. I bought a D3500E styli (XSV) and mounted "it" on the HZS. I must admit, I have never tried the D98s styli on the HZS. Your findings have got me thinking. Your calibrated numbers compared to the published numbers are kind of surprising. I need to look at mine. After hearing the 981s, and owning a 881s many years ago, I do agree with you. No comparison between the two. Not even close. Regards, Don |
To All,
Before anyone misunderstands, the TL4S that Tom (timeltel), and I have been talking about is a M/M type stylus. That means 880/881s and above line of cartridges. Anything below, XV15, 680/681 are M/I. THEY ARE NOT INERCHANGABLE! I would hate to have someone with a 681EEES buy a TL4S, on our recommendation, only to discover it doesn't work! Regards, Don |
To those interested, An old thread pertaining to Stanton/Pickering. Alot of useful information for the uninformed. For others, well, a refresher.
http://forums.audioreview.com/analog-room/stanton-881s-stylus-replacement-new-cartridge-28162.html
Regards, Don |
Timeltel and fellow Stanton/Pickering friends,
Hi Tom. As usual, your post are an absolute encyclopedia of information. I had to reread twice to absorb everything you provided. Your gift is much appreciated.
"The TL4S is a P-mount design, styli should be compatible with your Stanton carts."
My "resources" confirm you are correct. I hope someone in need of a replacement styli picks one up and enlightens the rest of us. Could be that non-available Stantering replacement stylus we have all been looking for! Take care my friend, Don |
Lewm,
I have in both of my posts to you, forgot to mention how lucky I feel you are in owning a XSV7500. You are living in rarified air territory with that one.
Regards, Don |
Dear Acman3,
"Or do I tell my daughter at college to get a job and buy both?"
You have answered your own question! |
Lewm,
I have the BAT VK10Se with all the latest upgrades. That includes the latest Lundahl SUT's. The BAT gives me from 44db up to 78db's of gain, more than enough for the 981's. With that said, I must admit I prefer the LZS over the HZS. Is there something that I could put my finger on to state why? No, there's not except this. I have set up both the LZS and the HZS on Graham arm wands and dialed it them in with the Mint LP device. The arm wand with the HZS gets cartridges rotated on it (removing the HZS). The wand with the LZS remains set up. I refuse to remove it from its wand. Subconsciously I think my brain is telling me something. Res. set at 47K, and cap. set at 100 plus the low cap. cables. I wish I could define what I like about one over the other, but frankly speaking, I could live easily for the rest of my life with either of them in my system. If you have heard the AT180/170 OCC, or the Signet TK10 MKII, you will have an ideal of what a 981s sounds like. Just a little more refined. Hard to imagine that considering the level of performance the mentioned comparison cartridges are at but believe it. Raul has hinted at but not come right out and said that the 981s is M/C like in its performance. I agree with him in that "hint" if you are only talking about what M/C's do right.
Regards, Don |
Raul,
I did see the "315 flat nose" listing but because I already have a "312 flat nose" on its way to Axel for upgrades, I passed. You did get quite a deal on it as far as price! What do you intend doing with the "315"? Perhaps also sending it off to Axel. Regards, Don |
Hi Lewm,
" Apparently you have not been reading my posts all these months,"
Not true! I read all posts. There is far to much information/knowledge available on this forum that everyone can learn from. BTW I had to look up the "perspicacious". Thank you for the compliment, I'm humbled. You do BTW, own a "whole" XSV7500, you just don't know. The body/generator you are using on the "4500" is the same (exactly), as that which is used on the "7500". I do believe that if you marry the two together, and compare it with your 981s, you will prefer the "7500" because of the cherry picked comments I mentioned in a earlier thread. I gave up on looking for the "7500". There's just none available. You have a hell of a stash of "gems". As far as "liking" distortions, all equipment are full of distortions. Manufacturers can not even built two pieces of equipment that measures "exactly" the same. This is due to tolerances,(+/-) in every component part that is in every piece of equipment. More parts, more combinations of tolerance variances. Regards, Don |
Travbow,
Your cartridge may not be at the Post Office. Perhaps the tracking hasn't been updated. I've lost count of how many items showed held up in Flordia, or New York etc. yet got delivered to me that very afternoon hear in Boise Idaho. Just the fact that your item "IS" in Axels hometown should be conforting. It could have been lost somewhere in transit. Regards, Don |
|
Timeltel,
Hi Tom. Your imput ref. (the Pickering DTL-4S), got me looking around. I picked one up at Turntables.com for list $184. Cashed in $70 worth of gift certificates and so the total paid was $114. 5/7 days shipping so I'll post my findings next week. Just under the 12/22 deadline! Regards, Don |
Lewm,
I have seen the "1's", the "2's" and the "3's" for sale on ebay but never have I seen a "4". I own a 981LZS and a 981HZS. I thought this DTL-4S just might be a nice addition to go with either of the 981 bodies. I have been for many years a Stanton/Pickering fan. Had a 881S back in the "70s". Turntable was a Philips GA312. There was/is a lot more for that cartridge to give than what that table was able to provide. Great T/T though. I still have it and do use it ocasionally. Current cartridge on it is a Empire 2000E with a LPGear 4000DIII stylus. Regards Don |
Travbow,
"If I would of known the extra trouble us damn foreigners cause I would not have bothered sending it"
Give Andy just outside of Seatle a try. "Phonocartridgeretipping.com" He did and excellent job rebuilting a M/C cartridge for me with a turnaround time of only 21 days. Highly recommended by quite a few people on several forums! Regards, Don |
Good Morning Tom,
I have sent an email to PickeringUK asking them about that very question. I have bought several stylus's from Turntableneedle.com and know them to be a very reputable supplier. I am confident that what I'm about to receive from them will actually be an original Pickering styli. I'm wondering if when Pickering/Stanton moved from New York to Florida, if they started replacing the "Sterohedron" with a "line contact"? It would have been a lot easier to obtain. I'm reminded of the fact that their move to Florida was a cost cutting move. One more point to conceder. There is no mention of a line contact stylus in Richard Steinfelds handbook. His publication follows Stanton/Pickering cartridge/styli manufacturing during the "Golden age of analog". This would be up to but not after the Florida move. I am not doubting PickeringUK statements about selling original Pickering styli. But I'm beginning to think that a lot of what's being sold by PickeringUK was manufactured after the Florida move. When Stanton/Pickering went "disco". Regards, Don |
Tom,
Just received a reply from Turntableneedles.com. It was a confirmed NOS Stereohedron styli. Still waiting for PickeringUKs reply.
Regards, Don |
Tom and all interested. The folowing is my question and the reply from PickeringUK.
__________________________________________________ Reply: Stereohedron is Pickering's name for their line contact tips.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: griffithds@jaws.bz To: eSales@PickeringUK.com Subject: Stylus question Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012
Good Morning, You have a DTL-4S for sale stated as a line contact. I have a original Pickering DTL-4S that is a Stereohedron. Is the difference between the two styli a matter of mine is from New York plant and yours is from the Flordia plant? If there is some other reason (unnown to me), for the two styli profiles, both being a DTL-4S. Thank you for your reply in advance. Regards, Don Griffith ____________________________________________________
First time I have ever heard of a Stereohedron refered to as another name for line contact! Shibata, yes, but line contact? |
Correction: Statement I made on 12/10/12
"Before anyone misunderstands, the TL4S that Tom (timeltel), and I have been talking about is a M/M type stylus. That means 880/881s and above line of cartridges. Anything below, XV15, 680/681 are M/I. I would hate to have someone with a 681EEES buy a TL4S, on our recommendation, only to discover it doesn't work!"
The TL4S is NOT a M/M. It is a M/I. It will NOT work on the 880/881 and above. Anything below that line of cartridges, the XV15, 680/681 is acceptable. Just the opposite of what I stated. My deepest apppolgies to all for my mistake! I received the TL4S today and mounted it on a HLZ body. Dead quite. Nothing. That's when I started to compare my notes with Richards "Stanton/Pickering handbook" and discovered my notes were not correct. I then mounted my XV-15/750E, verified that everything was working, then swapped styli. The TL4S just creamed the much regarded 750E. More authoritive bass, greater dynamics overall with cleaner and more extended highs. This was with "0" hours of break-in. The best Stanton/Pickering M/I that I own is the Stanton L747S (D74S stylus). Stanton only had one M/I above it and that was the L847S (D84S stylus). I have mounted the TL4S on the L747S body. No contest there either. Easily bettered the highly thought of D74S which BTW is also a Sterohedron styli. I now have just over 7 hours on the L747S/TL4S and have to state, this is one hell of a stylus. My posts have been taking 12+ hours to appear on this thread so by the time you read this, I will have compared it to Stanton's top cartridges, the 981 LZS and the HZS. This stylus is definitely a winner. Regards, Don |
Raul,
Do you know how to correct data on the Vinyl Engine Cartridge Database? It states all Pickering TL-(x) cartridges are M/M. Lets not allow history to repeat itself! Regards, Don |
Raul,
Over the last few years, I have been following various forums discussing the Stanton/Pickering cartridges. I have a little note book on just them. Before the Richards handbook, the only information/knowledge I had was from my notebook of statements made by forum members that I trusted or just felt had correct knowledge. Richards handbook greatly added to that data base. I also bought the stylus thinking (from my notes), that the M/M line is what this stylus supported. Once I realized something was wrong, I went looking in Richards reference handbook for answers. Thumbing thru, I found nothing pertaining to the TL line. I had to reread the handbook from page 1. When I got to page 48, at the bottom of the page is a small list of cartridges/styli with cross-References to the line of like Stanton/Pickering cartridges. The TL-4Super cross-ref. is to the Stanton/Pickering M/I line. This little tidbit of information is the only mention of any of the TL line of cartridges. Like I said, I had to reread the entire handbook to find it. I have proven it to be true. There are two Stanton Guru's (ex employees), on that forum you reference. They both readily admit to not knowing everything but they are far more knowledgeable than I. For you, this cartridge journey will be like the Goldring G800. Cheap body (Stanton/Pickering M/I series), with surprise stylus (DTL-4S), = goldmine. You will not be disappointed. Regards, Don |
My post Dated 12-16-12 took 17 hours to get printed! Moderator states 4-8 hours. When is the high speed improvement suppose to take effect? |
|
Hi Acmam3
I have not tried a TL-4S cartridge, but I do now have my eye on a TL-3 body. What I'm trying to determine is if the TL-(X) bodies are any different than the TL(X)S bodies. Until Timeltel mentioned the DTL-4S stylus, I had not given the cartridge line much thought. I owe Tom a thank you for mentioning it in a previous post, thereby peeking my interest. From Richards handbook, it appears the TL-(x)S cartridge "bodies" are all the same. Only the stylus quality being the deciding factor for improvements in the "S" line. I am quite awe struck with the DTL-4S stylus top flight performance. I think it being thought of as a "P" mount type, has allowed most of us to overlook it. That is until now! Regards, Don |
Raul,
"Btw, I already bought a DTL-4S in NOS condition for the non-Pmount Pickering cartridge version,"
Is yours the tall Stanton looking version, or the short flat Pickering looking version. Mine looks like a Stanton housing. Regards, Don |
Tom, The following quote is from a person on the Lenco forum in reply to a question I put forth to Richard. What he has said sort of snaps everything into focus.
"Your Stanton L747S, and the other L7x7 models: Stanton 680 in a P-Mount. Exact model designation differs according to stylus.
The equivalent Pickerings are the TL series which are the Pickering XV-15 in a P-Mount. Exact model designation (TLE, TL3-S, etc.) differs according to stylus."
Save yourself some money and just get the stylus. You already have 2 usable (identical), bodies.
Regards, Don |
Thanks, Tom,
I will be looking for some Gold XV-15 motors. This DTL-4S is the top "P mount" Pickering stylus. Would not its twin be the top Pickering stylus in the XV-15 line. Is that not the XV-15/1800S! The Stanton twins to the TL line/XV-15 line was the 681 solid mount and the L7x7S "P" mount. There top stylus was the 681EEES and the D84S. You and I have a D74S which is a step down from the D84S. There is no doubt in my mind that the DTL-4S is better that the/our D74S. Like is said earlier, this DTL-4S is a winner. Thank you for bring it to my/our attention. Quite a find and I'm looking for another! Regards, Don
|
Raul, I also took note of Lewm's comment and found this on eBay (350668391609). For $21.75 it was a no brainer. The shear number of Stanton/Pickering M/I bodies that are out there, is stagering.
"I think that I will stay " calm " about Stanton/Pickering with my two Stanton 981 L/H version , the Pickering 5000XVS and the TL-4S."
Raul, with that group of cartridges, staying "calm" will be rather hard to do.
Regards, Don |
Raul,
After thinking a little more of your stay "calm" statement, I think I'm beginning to understand how you are able to come to that conclusion. With all the cartridges you have and have had, perhaps the excitement has dulled a little. I, and I would imagine others on this forum still look for and get excited over finding that stone cold bargain in a market of multi-thousand dollar cartridges. Your bar of "also ran cartridges" is much higher than most. This fact has to diminish some of that excitement factor that you have eluded to with your stay "calm". Your entire thread is based on NOT staying "calm" but getting excited and spreading the word on great finds. Keep the fires burning Raul. This is a great hobby! Regards, Don |
Raul,
"There are several manufacturer " line contact " versions. It's right the name " line contact for them ? well is IMHO not important what is important is that as the Shibata or the analog-6 or even the MR the Stereohedron has a wider groove contact."
The Signet TK 7SU is a claimed to be a Shibata tip by Audio Technica. Their TK 7CLA is claimed to be a Line Contact. By your above quote, then they both must be the same stylus! Are they? I have both and they sure don't sound the same to me. Regards, Don |
Raul
"About AT its Sibata ones are different than the Line Contact ones or the MR stylus shape even in what AT name it as Line Contact there are variations and diferent quality on the polish of the stylus or grain oriented and the like.
That is why I questioned PickeringUK's use of the term "Line Contact" for their Stereohedron stylus in their ad. They are not the same but different profiles. Same family but slightly different! Actually the Shibata came 1st. So it should be of the Shibata family, not line contact family.
Regards, Don
|
How about we start the New Year off with a horror story with a happy ending! Of the 2 Virtuoso's that I own, the Black with the Sound Smith's cantilever/stylus is the one kept in rotation. The original Red Wood with factory stylus/cantilever has been occupying shelf storage space. I discovered early on that its stylus guard also fits the Signet TK10 MKII cartridge in which I bought guard less. The TK10 also is kept in rotation so I have been storing the Red Wood guard less. Well a couple of months ago, while fumbling around looking for something on the shelf (wearing a sweater), somehow the bare stylus caught on my sweater sleeve and was flung across the room, bouncing off the far wall. After staring in disbelief, the only word that came to mind was S**T. I should of ordered a spare guard. Well, a few weeks ago, when my wife asked me what I wanted for Christmas, my quick reply was a Jico/Shibata stylus. After explaining to her what the hell I was talking about, one got ordered. To make this long story somewhat shorter, it has been received and the necessary trimming of the stylus housing has been accomplished and said stylus/plug installed. Well, upon first listen, I was not impressed. Thin, bass shy presentation. I tore everything down and reinstall/adjusted everything, No change. My first thought was surely Clear Audio didn't voice this cartridge to work only with the cheap ($33 at LPtunes), AT 95e stylus ! Perhaps, letting it run in for a few hours might change things. High hopes I did not have. Well, it didn't take a few hours, but only a few sides of record playing. I've never had a cartridge change so dramatically. Day/Night difference. It will be a few days before I get to compare it to my other Wood (the Sound Smith version). I can say that I am impressed with the added midrange clarity that is now quite noticeable. The Jico was money well spent, but not an operation for the faint of heart. I had considered transplanting the cheap AT95e for practice, but if "smart" was something I practiced, I would have bought a stylus guard many months ago. Thanks to all that brought this stylus/plug transplant to our attention. Fun exercise. Updates to follow. Regards, Don |
Hi Fleib, Your comments are one of the underlying reasons I bought mine from TurntableNeedles.com. Their add states Jico manufactured. Actually never had a problem with either suppliers but truth in advertising being what it is, well, stated Jico, I went with them. I had taken notes from some of your statements pertaining to this transplant and did have on my list a ATN7V. Now that I have done this opperation, I just might do a 152LP that I have lying around next. Maybe my 440MLa (also not being used). This just might be fun. You are one of the people I must thank for leading the way in this transplant. Thank You! Regards, Don |
|
Hi Fleib,
LPGear is in my understanding, the US distributor for Jico. Do you think Jico grades their stylus (grade 1,2,3,), then ships to LPGear? They (LPGear),then distributes to say TurntableNeedles and others, keeping the grades 1 for their own sale. Sounds like a good business decision to me. What you experienced kind of proves it. I think I'm going to start making all my Jico buys confined to just LPGear or Jico direct! The Beryllium cantilever is my favorite and what I would like to install in a Virtuoso. What that cantilever (with shibata tip), did to my Goldring G800 still to this day has me absolutely stunned! I haven't intended to cut up the housing of either of the previous mentioned stylus (152LP or 440MLa), but do a transplant to a much cheaper AT95e (LPGear $33), green in color housing in which I would cut up to fit into the Virtuoso. I understand it to have the screw for stylus removal. I've experienced far to many bend stylus by accidents. I have no desire to start bending them on purpose. I remember reading somewhere that during the removal of a Boron or Beryllium cantilever, that just the backing off of the screw, shattered the cantilever so I'm a little nervous about this! Considering your past experience and knowledge in this process, If you have additional or corrective input, it would be much appreciated. Thanks again Fleib for opening my eyes and ears to a this new experience! Best of Regards, Don |
Hi Fleib,
If the slight difference in cantilever angle was quantified, lets say 2 degrees positive, could you instead of bending the cantilever, just place a thin, very thin tapered wedge on top of the cartridge body at installation to the tone arm/headshell/arm wand? Wedge could be made from ebony, lead, carbon fiber or whatever to satisfy resonance questions. Would not a tone arm with VTA adjustment on the fly (like my Graham 2.2), be able to do the same thing? If we are talkin slight angle adjustment of the cantilever, seems to me that this method would be a simple answer. Perhaps I'm not mentally seeing something? Regards, Don
|
Hi Acman3 and Balkin comrade!
Never heard of the Th 981? Surprised at amount of difference between the your 2 cartridges numbers! I didn't know/realize actual readings could be "that" amount of difference. Regards, Don |
On the usaudiomart.com web site there is a Virtuoso Wood with a slightly bend stylus for sale. Concidering how easy and cheap ($33), to actually get a replacement stylus, the asking price of $250 seems down right cheap. If I didn't already own 2, you would of never seen this HEADS UP! |
Tom,
"Just a thought." Yea, and a very good one! Thanks to both you and Fleib. I'm not interested in having someone else change the Virtuoso. I wanted to do this myself. Yea, a fool and his money are soon parted but sometimes that's how we learn. Asking questions and having people like you two also contributes. Thanks. Regards, Don |
Thanks Fleib, I don't mean to be a pest over this. This angle difference must be far greater than I have been mentally picturing it. You still have given me additional options with your previous sugestions. Thanks again, over and out!
Best of Regards, Don |
Acman3 & Comrade Nikola,
I only have spec. sheets for my LZS. I bought the HZS used and it didn't come with anything but the stylus guard! From my Stanton Cartridge Specifications page, Tracking range---.75-1.5 Channel seperation 35db DC Resistance 535 Ohms Inductance 400 mH Output .8 mV Nandric, the specs. for the cartridge just mentioned are much closer to what you have stated. The cartridge the specs. I have just listed are from a Stanton 500EE MKII from their Broadcast series. Nandric, how sure are you that it is even a 981. Have you varied that it is even a M/M and not a M/I. |
Raul, As you are aware, I also have both the LZ and HZ 981's. I have spent hours swapping them back and forth trying to determine why "if at all", one could be preferred over the other. The comment you made, "tiny, tiny, hair", can not be stated more in the comparisons between these two cartridges. I have observed that after spending days listening to M/M,M/I style cartridges only, placing the LZ version in the session, I find it ever so slightly bright. Before anyone jumps to some type of conclusion, I must state I also tried it the other way. Days of listening to only M/C's, then adding to the session, the HZ version, I found it ever so slightly bass heavy. This hasn't come down to which is better, just what are the perceived differences. I too, could live with either, and I plan on doing just that. As far as one requiring a SUT and perhaps that's where the difference comes into play, well I hear no difference between weather SUT was in or out. When in, volume was set at 11:00. When out, the volume had to be set at 5:00. Perhaps there is distortion differences at various knob positions. I don't know. It's just to close to state one is better than the other. Preferring one over the other, well the door is wide open as to why, right down to signal levels pertaining to wire resistance in interconnect cables. Regards, Don Regards, |
Hi Professor,
Andy will take good care of the "TK7LCa". I intend dropping in on him this spring for a visit. Early M/C trip (Motorcycle not Moving Coil)! We're only a couple of hundred miles apart so for me (as well as it should be for you), a much safer shipment feeling than sending across the right pond to Axel. I've got a bid in on a Goldring G800 original stylus that Andy is waiting on. He wants to do a boron/LC replacement tip to see how well it compares to the Beryllium/Shibata stylus I had done with Axel. I am still quite impressed with the suspension rebuild he did on my Blue Oasis M/C. Sure is nice having someone so close with this type of expertise! I'm still in wonderment as to how Stanton/Pickering can get such amazing sound from their short fat (Home Depot looking), pipe of a cantiliver. Sprinkled with "pixie dust" as you say. Regards, and happy holidays to you, Don |
Stltrains,
"Has any of you tried the new Garrott P77i micro scanner."
I would also like to hear from someone with knowledge about this stylus. I do have on my P77 a Jico SAS1 stylus and concider it something special, I have heard it said that it betters the 77i micro scanner! Just words until someone I trust does a comparision. Shockingly more open and refined I must say is the SAS1 over the original P77. Regards, Don |