Do you play?

Since when is a musician also an audiophile? Every musician I have ever known has had no interest in "reproducing" music because they can "create" music. Please do not be offended by my statement, it is just what I have seen to be so fron 30+ years in HI FI. I wish more musicians cared about the sound because I consider it a crime to let engineers butcher a recording. Lets face it, it is the MUSIC INDUSTRY... Selling a bad recording is like making a car that handles poorly --- on purpose! Unfortunately the mediocre sounding recordings far outweigh the good ones.

yes i play. i started teaching myself the guitar close to 30 years ago. shortly thereafter i replaced my portable record player with my first real stereo, a dual turntable with shure cart, dynaco separates and A-25 speakers. the more i practiced and played the more easy it got to 'hear' and pick out the guitar parts whenever i heard music played anywhere, both live and reproduced. i never became a professional musician and over the years my stereo evolved in its expressiveness. i agree with hifiharv though. most of the working musicians i've met have not been very keen on having a high-end stereo...or on having a deeply involving day job, haha. but they all had some kinda playback thing that i think thrilled them as much as mine did me. nowadays i listen more than i play but i sure still enjoy doing both.

I don't think think there are less audiophiles among musicians. How many folks do you run into at work that don't think you are nuts comparing ac power cords and cables? There may be a few less just because of the money factor, y'know the phrase starving musician? There is a reason it was created. I used to play guitar in a rock band and refer back to the knowledge of how rock guitar sounds straight from the amp as well as in the studio as a reference for how my system reproduces that same "rock guitar" sound. I am sure folks who play other instruments do the same.

I play the piano. I've been playing for nearly 30 years and still do. Not only am I an audiophile, I'm also equally as picky about the instrument and the way it sounds. While I agree Hifiharv to some extent, not all of us can play like Glen Gould (I certainly can't). I also can't play the trumpet at all (never even tried), but love listening to Miles Davis. I need a really good system to hear how he is playing--how much air, how much pressure--how does he make the trumpet do that?? I also love vocals--but I can't sing to save my life. A great system that really recreates the human voice accurately is really a pleasure to listen to. Mark Levinson actually considers himself a musician first and an audiophile and equipment designer second. So for some musicians listening to the notes without the nuances that a high end system can provide is very satisifying. For me, it isn't. I want to hear everything. Not just the note that Glen Gould played, but all the harmonics right down to the lifting and setting of the dampers to his unusual humming in the background--to me that is the whole performance--far more satisfying on a high end rig.

I sing in a professional choir. I rarely go as a listener to a choral music concert. I usually only listen to recordings of choral music as a way to familiarize myself with the music. I also attend a lot of live concerts other than choral. This does not stop me from wanting great audio equipment. Where I feel I differ from most audiophiles, is I care almost entirely and exclusively how good the performance is. I could care less how good a recording sounds, if the performance is not as good as some other recording. I have good equipment because I want the recordings I do love to sound the best possible.