Tvad wrote:
"It seems 91db, 8 ohm speakers would be a more significant change from what I presently own in terms of efficiency and driving ease than would 94db, 4 ohm speakers."
Efficiency no; driving ease probably.
I assume you're quoting the 1-watt efficiency figures instead of "sensitivity" figures (sensitivity is referenced to 2.83 volts input; 2.83 volts into 8 ohms = 1 watt but 2.83 volts into 4 ohms = 2 watts. Sometimes manufacturers give the 2.83 volt sensitivity and call it "efficiency". Read closely to see if this is the case, especially with speakers whose nominal impedance is below 8 ohms). Assuming your numbers are efficiency and not sensitivity, then the 94 dB/watt, 4 ohm speaker would be 3 dB more efficient than the 91 dB/watt, 8 ohm speaker.
Now if the 4 ohm speaker manufacturer is actually quoting the 2.83 volt sensitivity instead of the 1 watt efficiency, then its actual 1 watt efficiency is only 91 dB, in which case both speakers have the same efficiency.
In either case, the 8 ohm speaker will most likely be the easier load. I say "most likely" because I sell a supposedly "8 ohm" speaker that's a more difficult load than most 4 ohm speakers due to the unusual nature of the load (it's a fullrange electrostat).
Now assuming that your tube amp is a transformer coupled push-pull type, as long as the manufacturer doesn't caution against 4 ohm loads you probably wouldn't have any problems. I would think that at a given SPL your amp would be less taxed by the 94 dB, 4 ohm speaker than by your present 89 dB, 6 ohm speaker. But I'm not sure about the comparison between the 94 dB, 4 ohm speaker and the 91 dB, 8 ohm speaker.
As you can see there are so many exceptions and caveats and what-if's that a generic answer probably won't suffice (see post by Gs5556 above as an example of how far off my generic answer could be). We might be better able to give useful information if you let us know the specific speakers and amp.
Duke