Why would anyone use HD Tracks for Downloads?


I really enjoy hi-res computer audio music files I've downloaded from Liaison in Europe. These files were recorded direct to digital and I download them as 24/96 FLAC or WAV files. There is an obvious improvement in dynamics, soundstaging, noise floor and detail over CD that make it worth the small increase in $$.
My understanding is that all, or at least the vast majority, of downloads offered by HD Tracks are nothing more than existing older standard resolution analog masters transferred to PCM or DSD format digital files. Standard resolution recordings transferred to a hi-resolution format cannot produce hi-res music files. An analogy is transferring a steak served on a small plate to a larger plate; the steak will still taste the same and there is no improvement in taste. Music originally recorded on a multi-track analog reel-to-reel recorder will have limited dynamic range, a higher noise floor, a limited frequency response and less detail than the same music recorded directly to digital.

I know there currently is a lack of major artists taking advantage of hi-res, direct to digital recording of their music. Most of the truly hi-res music seems to be coming from lesser known artists. I've found that i Trax in California and the Liaison Music Shop in Europe are 2 good sources of true hi-res recordings.

So, my question is to those that have downloaded supposed hi-res music files from HDTracks: Are you disappointed by the sound quality of your purchases from HDTracks? I would think you would be, since I believe you're listening to standard resolution files that should sound no better than CDs or records you may already own of the same material.

I'm very leery of buying HDTracks downloads not only because of the above, but also because they fail to list the source of their downloads; there's no mention of whether they're simply transfers of standard resolution masters or are recorded direct to digital and actually are hi-res.

I'm interested in readers' thoughts on avoiding standard resolution files advertised as hi-res.

Thanks,
Tim
noble100
I asked essentially the exact same question on another audio forum. I kinda don't think the analog master tapes are being made available to every Tom Dick and Harry. DVD Audio is 192/24 and there's nothing wrong with the sound of DVD Audio. Pity it went belly up in 2007.
"DVD Audio is 192/24 and there's nothing wrong with the sound of DVD Audio. Pity it went belly up in 2007.

You're right. Too bad the marketing wasn't as good as the sound quality.
I do not know the technical details but all of the hdtraks I downloaded were disappointments to me, and I only downloaded the hi res format ones. I tried several different genres, a few ones I had on cd, etc. For me a waste of money.
Skoczylas,

I don't know how your system is set up, but you need to put time and effort into setting a computer up as a source. Its no different than setting up a TT or picking the right CD player. The same thing happened to a lot of people with SACD. They went out and bought an entry level unit from a place like Best Buy and didn't get good results. They were asking too much of the format itself. I made that mistake. I went out and bought a cheap Sony 9000ES and put it next to my Wadia. It didn't go too well for the Sony. The CD sounded way better than the SACD. But when I put a SACD in the Sony, and compared it to the same recording on CD using the Sony, the DSD did sound better.
Dvd audio had the ability to go as high as 24/192 but rare were the recordings that met that watermark. Most were 24/48 or 96.

Also, have you ever looked at the actual wav. on those discs? I have and it ain't pretty. Most have hard compression and extreme listing on them....that would include Dire Straits, Paul Simon, Steely Dan and Talking Heads to name a few. What it is on or how it is encoded means nothing if the engineering or mastering butchered it.

But as a recording engineer I agree that when done properly digital can be great. Without digital I would not be doing what I do.