Merlin TSM comparisons

I had another long session with the new TSM-XMr's this evening. I swapped out the Skylan stand pegs for spikes and experimented with placement. After about 40 minutes I had a none-too subtle improvement in the mid bass and the speakers tightened up even more.

I went to some well known material....Fleetwood Mac, Joan Baez and a revealing acoustic of Everlong. The Merlins are amazing. Name the audiophile phrase of approval and they were there. What's exciting is that I'm still missing the Cardas interconnect and a better CD player in the mix. And of course break-in is far from complete.

I finished off with another old favorite; Copland conducts Copland (version with old American songs).....absolutely splendid.

Cheers and goodnight!

Rob

mapman because you are using ss with the ohms then the tsm i would recommend and the most reasonable is the mmi version. this is the one that rebbi is using and he uses a class d amp i believe. hoever both versions would perform very well with ss.
thank you, b

Yes, as Rebbi pointed out, OHM Walsh (and omnis in general) do imaging differently than monitors, planars or any other more directional designs. I will not say necessarily better or worse, just different. Some will take to it and never look back and others will not. To me, it is more like what you hear at a live event and less like a typical stereo presentation. The large sweet spot is a unique feature as well.

I like good monitors for their ability to allow you to focus into recording details, particularly at lower volumes. You can do this with properly set up OHMs as well, but it is different. Also I like to play music at realistic volumes and delivering a live like presentation at live like volumes is a forte of the OHMs. If not for that, I may have been satisfied with my Dynaudio monitors which I acquired prior up trying out the newer OHM Walshes.

Bobby,

Thanks for the info.

I'll keep an eye out for the opportunity to audition teh MErlins and see if they convince me to jump from what I have.

Bobby,

Curious about the two versions and use with SS versus tubes.

My understanding is the difference is the finish and perhaps cabinet construction. IS that correct?

Is the extra rigidity or damping ability of the upper model what makes it more tube friendly?

Thanks.