is Lessloss signature that much better than orig?

I an breaking in 2 Sigs after having had the Originals. I will have more to say when I have had more time to listen, but my early impressions are that the Sigs are significantly better, perhaps a 25-30% improvement if I had to quantify. They seem smoother, sweeter and fuller-bodied than the Originals, with no loss of detail but instead greater musical realism. Right now one is on pre, but intend to put one on DAC as well to see how that works.

Neal

Yes, I find the signature version much better. agreed with Neal observation.

Recent review at dagogo.

I'm always wary of the "different" sound that is not "better."

I bought an original because I was doubtful about how much a difference a power cable would make in my system, and didn't want to outlay so much money for a signature as a trial cable.

The usual break-in period passed with my noting the apparent ease of the sound of the original.

So I began reading about the signature, and thought the upgrades discussed made sense.

Both the original and the signature "do no harm." Both have a natural and easy sound from the beginning.

But the signature's mods touch the heart of the upgrade, and appear to me to work so naturally that whether I looked at the bass, the highs, or the mid-range, everything was more open and musical.

I listened to them with Indian ragas, Tudor choirs, chamber music, symphonies, pop, and jazz. The signature is better than the original in a way that I find remarkable.

I agree that signature is much better than original. I have had 2 originals and update to 4 signatures (update Synergistic T2 and T3 pre and power ARC). Before my conclusion I listened both for a time. Nglazer and Arelef are right.