Interconnect integrity question


I come to all of my audio compatriots with a question I hope you all can help me with. I have been asked to do some beta testing of interconnects. At first glance, I thought it might be a good idea. I'd be testing(comparing) cables of different wire gauges, trying to provide an input in the very thin gauge versus thicker(22) guage wire argument. This whole thing has emerged on the scene VERY fast, literally in the past two weeks. I don't recall much discourse in this subject previous to this month. It seems a lot of people out here have come out of nowhere preaching the merits of miniscule wire gauge. I have previously tried very thin wire in two VERY limited auditions. I try to stay away from flavor of the month audio, relying instead on good equipment I can live with for a LONG(5 years, MINIMUM!) time. Upon further thought of this offer, I became a bit more apprehensive. The only thing I bring to this site is my opinion. My opinion is worthless without a certain measure of credibility. I feel that perhaps in entering into a relationship with a manufacturer, I lose that credibility(as some others have, at least in my mind). I have NEVER allied myself with ANY company. I do however voice support of companies I feel offer excellent sound and/or value for money. My question to all of you good people is that should I accept this offer? I may buy the cable(I am not in need of it), and give an objective critique. But I am interested in the opinions of as many of our members as possible. I am not saying, I will go with "majority rules", although your opinions will be one of the determining factors(weighing heavily) in my decision. Thank you all for your consideration.
trelja
We are a manufacturer and would I like to post this response which I hope is not seen as being too biased!! Just to say that your question is a very good one, coming from someone who is obviously honorable and (judging by your other posts) a genuine audio enthusiast. It may help you to know that from our point of view we believe that it can be very difficult for someone (such as yourself) to be seen to be enthusiastic about a particular product and not come across as being "in the pocket" of the manufacturer. When we have products out for beta-test all we expect back from the trial is for the individual who trials the item to complete a survey sheet which gives us their honest impressions. When we are asked if there is any problem if mention about the beta-trial is made to others, our usual response has been to say "no problem if you mention it to your friends and other audio enthusiasts, you are free to say as you please, good or bad!" From our point of view we would obviously be pleased to get publicity by means of someone writing about our products but only as long as that publicity is freely given and without there appearing to be any bias one way or the other. Maybe the best course of action is similar to the one you have taken and that is to make it clear from the outset that the person is testing/comparing a particular product, that they have no connection with the manufacturer other than they have been asked to freely participate and that they will post their findings (good or bad) when they have finished the test? Bear in mind though that the subject of cables is becoming very "touchy" and that what works in one room/system may not be so good in another. I feel people lose sight of this when they vehemently recommend one product over another! There is no such thing as the best product, only what is best in a particular circumstance. The only true way to test any product, even more so with cables, is in the system the component is going to reside in (hopefully for many pleasurable listening years). Hope this helps and thank you for reading this, regards, Richard at www.vantageaudio.com
Go for it. I do not see any harm that can come of it. If your honest with your impressions who care what others think.