I prefer to not think in terms of better... I would say Cd is better if I want something easy and fast, multi hours of non stop music...
LP is more labor intensive, needs more involvement,(and LP playback is rewarding in being ultimately more satisfying for that effort.) and is equally as interesting, in a different way, than CD.
IF the pre, amp and speakers are the same, and it is just switching from one source to the other... IMHO one would spend about the same on the analogue portion of the system as on the digital... in a mid-fi* system (*$3,000 to $10,000. total all stuff)
In a low-fi system ($300 to $2,000 it all depends on the kind of flaws you prefer...)
LP is more labor intensive, needs more involvement,(and LP playback is rewarding in being ultimately more satisfying for that effort.) and is equally as interesting, in a different way, than CD.
IF the pre, amp and speakers are the same, and it is just switching from one source to the other... IMHO one would spend about the same on the analogue portion of the system as on the digital... in a mid-fi* system (*$3,000 to $10,000. total all stuff)
In a low-fi system ($300 to $2,000 it all depends on the kind of flaws you prefer...)

