I appreciate the feedback from you guys. Sean, I will do a little wordsmithing and may even use your word as written to clarify. I thought it was pretty clear that the SOURCE was designed exclusively for typical front end equipment which draws low current.
As in Viggens case, he did have some difficulties with shut downs because the passive filtrations devices probably kicked the total resistance up higher than what the cord was designed to take. After he removed those devices, I assume by his e-mails, that the cord performed fine and he was pleased with the sound.
Perhaps I should not have called it a review, but feedback which is what I have titled on the web page.
I really don't think that I'm in the same league as Corona.
I don't have any "unknown resources sent from above" in my cords.
Carbon is a natural conductor, is it as good as silver, NO.
Evereything in this world has a resistance factor. Carbon may not be as good as some of the conductive materials, however, the trade-offs may be very worthwhile. Worthwile enough to apply for a patent which I did. Maybe that I will own a patent on something that I only use.LOL
In closing, just to show how crazy this whole thing can get, go to Audio Asylum and read the post from "Sonny" who claims that my cords are hocus and a rip off. One of the monitors from AA called me last night, and we talked. I told him I had no idea who this guy was and he definetly did not have one of my cords. I think I know who sonny is by the style of writing and the mispelled words.
Thanks, Michael
