Audio Aero Pirma DAC versus MF TriVista 21 DAC

Mattheus,

It's indeed most likely an AC problem, but probably otherwise then is stated before. I've had the same thing occuring with my auditioning of an AA Capitole mkII. In my case I had the AAC correctly plugged in my MIT Z-center (wich is very important with AAC), but my poweramp in the wrong way. Indeed pain in my poor ears! First I also tried other cables, but this didn't chanched anything of course. Everything plain on the mains, that was the moment I discovered my mistake with the poweramp.
So check if the rest is connected in phase on the main.

Good luck, Edzard

Hello,
I just compared the trivista21 with a.a. prima dac (latest version)...
both are very good. both are very smooth & neither has
the nasty digital sound that many cd players have. neither are sharp. the aa is costlier and maybe worth the difference in price. the aa has more depth and is a bit more involving. unfortuantely, cable makes a difference
the $1200 aes/bu cable was significantly better than the $30 & $75 coax cable. however, sound on the cheaper cables
was enjoyable and had no unpleasantness. i used an accustic art tranport (excellent i think)...it is possible that you may have to
play around with transports/dac combinations (along with cable) to get rid of the nastiness you are experincing

rgds
munna

I own the AA Prima SE DAC and have got to compare it to the MF DAC on two occasions using a Sony SCD-1, Audio Research CD3 MKII, and an Orpheus Zero D, as transports. The digital cable was always the Siltech G5 golden Ridge. No matter what the system used the AA was always a much nicer sounding DAC. More musical and at the same time much more detailed with a cleaner sound to it. Bass control was better and everything seemed more focused. When using the Orpheus as transport with the Siltech the AA Prima SE DAC, to my ears it does everything right.
The rest of the system was Audio Research and Maggie 3.6 speakers.