Personally, I find it much more important for a reviewer to tell me how a component sounds than if it is "good" or "bad". My sense is, with the severly reduced size of the major hi-fi criticism mags, that there is little space to waste on completely worthless components. That said, to take Stereophile, for example, Art Dudley wrote a negative review of the new Rega Apheta cartridge two months ago and John Atkinson has had negative comments about many, many components due to their test bench measurements, the Harmonic Technology light cables and Yamamoto Soundcraft amp being recent examples.
Best Place for Negative Reviews?
As I've started reading more reviews of audio equipment, I'm noticing a discouraging trend: They're all positive! If I read one more article that says "this (insert component here) competes with anything 3 times its price!" one more time, I may completely lose faith in reviewers.
And maybe everything above a certain price range sounds good to certain people...but that's the kind of undiscerning ear that doesn't help me learn about which components I should seek to audition.
Is it just me, or do we need more reviewers who put a stake in the ground and just decide which components actually ARE the best values, and which ones you really are just getting what you pay for?
And maybe everything above a certain price range sounds good to certain people...but that's the kind of undiscerning ear that doesn't help me learn about which components I should seek to audition.
Is it just me, or do we need more reviewers who put a stake in the ground and just decide which components actually ARE the best values, and which ones you really are just getting what you pay for?
- ...
- 31 posts total
- 31 posts total

