actually, i read it more broadly. i believe it allocates responsibility to the Seller if an item arrives in non-working order even if shipping did not cause the problem. the statement "it will ALWAYS be the responsibility of the seller to guarantee..." leads me to that conclusion. i interpret this as a statement that audiogon's policy is that, unless the parties agree otherwise, the seller broadly warrants good working order on delivery. i concede, however, that such a broad statement seems somewhat out of place in a FAQ regarding shipping.
in practice, it would rarely make a difference. if an item showed up in less than working order, the buyer would likely blame shipping even if there was no obvious evidence that shipping had caused the damage -- and it would be hard for the seller to disagree (as this might seem like a concession that the seller was actually at fault for sending damaged goods). as a result, the audigon policy would apply and the seller would have to take the item back, provide a refund, and attempt to collect an insurance claim.
in practice, it would rarely make a difference. if an item showed up in less than working order, the buyer would likely blame shipping even if there was no obvious evidence that shipping had caused the damage -- and it would be hard for the seller to disagree (as this might seem like a concession that the seller was actually at fault for sending damaged goods). as a result, the audigon policy would apply and the seller would have to take the item back, provide a refund, and attempt to collect an insurance claim.

