A Question on Speaker Driver Efficiency


I have been tweaking my guitar amps, by upgrading the speakers.

I installed a larger speaker (was 8" now 10") in my bass amp, but I made sure it was very efficient - net result
- not only is the bass much deeper sounding,
- but because the new driver was more efficiant I now play at a lower volume.

So I am now considering upgrading my other amp (i.e. used for my 6 string) and got to thinking about building a new cabinet that houses two speakers.

I know that connecting the speakers in ...
- series will double the impedance, i.e. 2 x 4 ohms would have an onverall impedance of 8 ohms
- parallel will halve the impedance, i.e. 2 x 16 ohms would have an onverall impedance of 8 ohms

But what I have not been able to get my head around is...
- what will each connection method (i.e. series or parallel) have on the "combined" sensitivity rating?
- e.g. if both speakers are rated at 96db sensitivity, will the overall sensitivity change due to the connection method or remain at 96db?

Since I can get 4 ohm or 16 ohm drivers - which connection method would be best? series or parallel?

in case it is a factor
- the amp is 15 watts into 8 ohm
- I am looking at employing two identical drivers each rated at 96db sensitivity
- 96 db (or higher) is the target for the combined sensitivity

Any help is appreciated - Many Thanks Steve
williewonka
"Speaker sensitivity is measured in decibels per 1 watt per 1 meter, but is usually referred to as just decibels [source: JBL]."

For an 8 ohm load, this equates to 2.83 volts. But for a 4 ohm load it’s 2.00 volts and for a 16 ohm load its 4.00 volts. Because the OP said the speakers have the same "sensitivity," this has been accounted for.

And yes, JBL does put more wire and turns in the gap for their higher impedience speakers leading to a high Bl.

In fact, there are cases where the higher impedience model looses travel (Xmax) because of this difference.

And seeing as how JBLs are the only make of speaker that matter in my household, I stand behind the logic that a higher impedience typically leads to a higher Bl.

As to the effects of inductance, I did note that there is interaction between the two speakers in a series set-up (goes beyond inductance) that does not exist in the parallel set-up, and for these reasons I would choose a parallel set-up.  
@ toddalin

The industry standard for as long as I can remember relies on a fixed voltage to assess a loudspeaker's sensitivity - not power input. In this way, it doesn't matter what the loudspeaker's impedance is. All are judged on the same level playing field. No one has to adjust drive level to compensate for a "nominal" impedance rating. All drivers under test get the same voltage applied and no concern is paid to the current drawn - simply the acoustic output that is generated. If the driver or loudspeaker under test's efficiency is sought, then the unit of power  (watt) is a concern - not the unit of force applied (volt). If you had any electrical engineering experience, you'd know this and would stop quoting a JBL cut sheet as "your Bible".

As to the 16 ohm bit, I give up. I did my best to explain it to you and have obviously failed. Know one thing though. You aren't the only knowledgeable JBL "fanboy". I happen to be listening to a pair of 250ti Limiteds that I've had since new (1992). My first pair of speakers was the L19s I bought - probably before you were born...ugh....that hurts to say.... In any case, please take some heartfelt advice that is not meant to demean you or put you down - there is alot more to learn about electrical, acoustical, and mechanical engineering than what you will find in a JBL cut sheet. I know. Before engineering school, I studied the very same cut sheets you clearly obsess over.
The L19 made it’s debut in the 1979 catalog. Seeing as how I’ve been into JBLs since the 60’s, it sounds like you are the newcomer.

I've even developed and make products for use with classic JBLs.

https://youtu.be/pbbS0QYK2_o

http://www.audioheritage.org/photopost/data//500/medium/Resized1.jpg

http://www.audioheritage.org/photopost/data//500/medium/Tweeters1.jpg

I never said that the higher impedience meant that the speaker would have a higher Bl, but allowed for it, and showed several examples to that effect.

You’ve not shown one model that demonstrates otherwise.

As for sensitivity, you are using your definition,. and I am using mine, and both exist in many places on the internet.

How can you know that the manufacturer for the speakers from the OP isn’t using the same definition that I am using?

BTW, when someone types "You’re out of your league," this typically indicates that they are at the limits of their own understanding and just don’t want to show their ignorance by pushing it further or are too head strong to consider another point of view.
"Also, speakers with higher impedience tend to have a high Bl, and therefore follow the signal more accurately. " - toddalin

" And seeing as how JBLs are the only make of speaker that matter in my household, I stand behind the logic that a higher impedience typically leads to a higher Bl. " - toddalin

" I never said that the higher impedience meant that the speaker would have a higher Bl, but allowed for it, and showed several examples to that effect." - toddalin


Have you posted these revelations in any other forums? I'm curious what the response was. At this point, I'm starting to get embarrassed that I even responded to you in the first place - clearly, this must be your idea of a joke.  On the other hand, I suppose it is possible that you could just be utterly clueless or that you simply enjoy talking in circles.. Either way, it's a waste of my time to try to convince you of anything since you're so convinced of your special "expertise". Have a nice day!


I look at PV, Eminence, and others..., and yes, for the same models, the higer impedience version typically has the higher Bl.

So, contrary to what some would say, I guess that JBL is not the only one who does this and the OP is advised to check the specs for the selected speakers for himself.

Obviously, someone else around here hasn't even bothered to look at the various manufacture's similar offerings to confirm or deny their beliefs.