I used to be in the @williewonka camp, but I've since gained a much deeper appreciation for what subs bring to the table after hearing demos in a couple different systems. Both systems were high end with expensive full-range speakers, and in both instances the systems started out with subs engaged and sounded fantastic. Then the subs were turned off and it was amazing how much changed. Obviously bass dynamics were not as impactful, but what was really surprising was that in both cases there was a significant reduction in perceived air and space, and the whole soundstage compressed and sounded like it had a lot of the life just sucked out of it. I had no desire to listen to either system without the subs after that. I can't explain exactly why subs seem to significantly impact aspects of sound other than just bass, but they do. Anyway, for those who still think subs are there to create rumble and handle pipe organs should seriously think again. And with the growing number of processors out there to take the pain out of sub integration this has become a no brainer for me. Plus there are direct sellers like SVS that give you a 45-day trial period so you can see if I'm a liar with little or no risk. There's a reason Wilson builds $25,000 subs, and it ain't just to pair with Duettes or Sabrinas. Anyway, FWIW.
Are subs worth the price for music?
My current speakers are Vandersteen 3A's. I consider them to have a good, solid low end. Specs say 26hz, -3db, if I remember. That's lower than most any music. I'm considering adding a vandy sub, possibly two to the system. My question is, for strictly music, are subs even worth while...$$$......if so, why? What could I expect that's different and/or better than what I'm already hearing..............No experience with subs and music, so forgive the lame question for those of you who already use them.