I went from a 2.1 to a 2.0 system and then added the sub back to the system! Honestly, the frequency response of the speaker may be accurately reported by the manufacturer but as pointed out in other posts, the sub gives the system bloom. My floorstanders are pretty much full range but I crossover at 80 Hz, which is a common recommendation for good reason - it sounds the best in my system. I am now on the hunt for a second sub to add to my system to take it up to 2.2. My room isn’t huge: basement man cave measuring about 20’X20’ but with ceilings only 6.5’. I will add that it doesn’t matter what type of music you play; they all benefit from a sub. Acoustic guitar right through to full on electronica. True, some people are never satisfied with the integration of a sub into their system but I sense that their are more happy 2.1 campers than not.
Are subs worth the price for music?
My current speakers are Vandersteen 3A's. I consider them to have a good, solid low end. Specs say 26hz, -3db, if I remember. That's lower than most any music. I'm considering adding a vandy sub, possibly two to the system. My question is, for strictly music, are subs even worth while...$$$......if so, why? What could I expect that's different and/or better than what I'm already hearing..............No experience with subs and music, so forgive the lame question for those of you who already use them.