coupling or decoupling of vinyl to/ from platter


Dear all,

I'm puzzled by a number of claims about record clamps and mats. 

I own an old Rega Planar 3, and I was reading about the importance of coupling the record to the platter, to add effective mass to the record to reduce vibrations, slippage etc, and improve the solidity that the groove "image" presents to the stylus. 

I also read about the importance of de-coupling the vinyl from the platter to prevent the transmission of unwanted vibrations from the motor. Rega has a very dense platter made of glass with a fluffy felt mat on top. So, felt to decouple lp from platter, is that right? 

Then, I purchased a cork Music Hall mat, which has a dozen raised cork discs on the mat to BOTH "decouple" the lp from the platter and "grip" the lp.  Music Hall claims that clamps are unnecessary with this mat because coupling discs, etc. I also, without knowing this, purchased a Rega Michell record clamp. The clamp seems to do good things regardless of the mat, and of course evens out warped records a little bit. 

There needs to be, it would seem, a clear objective answer to all of  this from an engineering perspective. Coupling does x, and decoupling does y.  If you look at all the high-end turntables, they have massive platters and clamps. So coupled mass is good for flywheel effect and also  for presenting a solid "image" to the stylus? 

Either Rega and Pro-Ject are dead wrong with felt mats, and have been runaway successes in spite of this, or the felt is adapted to their setup: weak motor, relatively light but super-dense platter, and decoupling felt to manage the motor and rotational noise transmitted up the spindle, and to hell with coupling?  

I did some quick and tentative experiments with the Music Hall mat and clamp vs. Rega felt mat with clamp. I need to do more comparison. The results are different but hard to characterize. I'll post again with more comprehensive subjective tests. 

From an engineering perspective, which should be best, Rega clamp w felt, Music Hall mat by itself, or "screw the mods, Rega it great just the way it is, heretic!!!" ?

Let the games begin!

Paul

paulburnett
Just got up from Asylum (where my gear is).
What a great story, like a fairy tale, quite a touching one. I almost cried. 
But the laboratory view made me laugh out loud :)
I´m also living in a cave, most of the time ;_).

@tbg I'll bet "the laboratory" was dusty with your wife weaving in it. My wife is into textile crafts too and the dust created is phenomenal and not a great mix with vinyl records.
@Paulburnett   You will love the Herbie's mat, I just got one on my VPI SSM and the difference is nothing short of amazing
George Merrill at one time made a platter with a sealed layer of lead on top. Then there are the graphite mats, which some love.
Interesting. If you look at forum topics regarding the use of 180g for new audiophile releases the general view seems to be exactly the opposite of what Merrill proposes?
Folk seem to prefer 120g to heavier vinyl.
They also seem to think it is little more than a marketing ploy.

Personally I hear little difference but I'm not a damping-is-king kind of guy. It may be attributable to the scheme that I use.