Horn based loudspeakers why the controversy?


As just another way to build a loudspeaker system why such disputes in forums when horns are mentioned?    They can solve many issues that plague standard designs but with all things have there own.  So why such hate?  As a loudspeaker designer I work with and can appreciate all transducer and loudspeaker types and I understand that we all have different needs budgets experiences tastes biases.  But if you dare suggest horns so many have a problem with that suggestion..why?
128x128johnk

Showing 2 responses by bdp24

John, it’s just like anything else; there are good horn loudspeakers, and not so good. They got their bad reputation from the PA designs of the "dark ages" (1940’s-50’s). The old Altec A7 was a very popular PA loudspeaker (my teenage band had a pair), and was incredibly colored. It was fine for sound reinforcement, but recorded music, especially voices, sounded ridiculous coming out of it. Cup your hands in front of you mouth and speak or sing; that’s what they sounded like. J. Gordon Holt used the obvious term "cupped-hand vowel coloration" when reviewing such-sounding speakers.

Horn design has come a long way since then. I knew a Wilson/Vandersteen dealer (Brooks Berdan, R.I.P.) whose personal home loudspeaker was a pair of Jadis Eurythmie’s, which sound incredible! You pay dearly for them, however.

Not to mention the 16Hz tone of the lowest pipe organ pedal! Some of the other lower pedals also create sub-40Hz tones, as does, as wolf said, the far left end of the grand piano keyboard. Recordings made in large venues (cathedrals, churches, large theaters) often contain sub-40Hz room sound.