How can you not have multichannel system


I just finished listening to Allman Bros 'Live at the Fillmore East" on SACD, and cannot believe the 2-channel 'Luddites' who have shunned multichannel sound. They probably shun fuel injected engines as well. Oh well, their loss, but Kal has it right.
mig007
I have not had the opportunity to listen to a really good multichannel system/setup with music as the predominant medium. I've heard some pretty darned impressive multichannel systems featuring DVD movie format. Additionally, I only have a two-channel system. This is my disclaimer - since the hostiles are a bit ramped up here.
That being said, I have always been of the impression that two-channel audio, for music, presents the most realistic soundstage, including the best centralized imaging capabilities. I would not be surprised however, if advancements in technology will (or possibly already have) change the proverbial playing field, or at least offer legitimate alternatives. When multichannel gets it right, does it merely provide a realistic “concert hall” experience, or does it also capture the essence of the performance – sans reverb, room acoustics and atmosphere? Just what is mixed into the other channels? The stage is always coming at you from in front of your position. Certainly, a multichannel mix does not include any instruments/vocals coming from anywhere other than the front – right???? So, what is being channeled to the other channels - reverb, crowd noise…what? What am I missing here?
I heard a multichannel Black Crows DVD at the local Best Buy and found it laughable to hear the guitar coming from the rear channel. I’m sure it was a bad mix, and for certain it was….well, it was a Best Buy system. Anyway, in defining the differences between two-channel and multichannel, just what are some of the more significant characteristics/qualities of one format over the other? I mean in addition to the whole horse drawn carriage analogy and Reggie Jackson quote - which is over my head!
Just what is mixed into the other channels? The stage is always coming at you from in front of your position. Certainly, a multichannel mix does not include any instruments/vocals coming from anywhere other than the front – right???? So, what is being channeled to the other channels - reverb, crowd noise…what?

2chnlben (System | Threads | Answers)

This is the essence of my question as well. For example, in the multi channel version of "Blood on the Tracks", one listener comments that the rear channels appear to have the same information as the front channels, but the rear channels are mixed in at lower volumes. Is this an attempt to create what a mic placed in the rear of the studio might have recorded had there been one in the studio?
2chnlben...The idea that performers should always be in front of you does not reflect the reality of a jazz jam session or a chamber music performance in your home. Note also my earlier posting about antiphonal music. Ambience is not the only sound for surround channels.
01-04-09: Eldartford
2chnlben...The idea that performers should always be in front of you does not reflect the reality of a jazz jam session or a chamber music performance in your home.
Perhaps not, but sitting in on a jazz jam session or hearing a chamber music performance in one's home (all I have seen still have the listeners in front of the performers, not surrounded by them) are not music experiences typical of most performances.

Are we to assume multi channel makes us part of the performer's perspective?

I can see where multi channel can be interesting for specialized performances/recordings, but limited in application.