Sean, if you read Steve's follow-up, he wasn't supporting Curl (or you) with his post. He was being sarcastic and even said so.
Steve quotes you:
"I know that some very limited testing that i've performed has shown differences in distortion and microphony using recently calibrated HP equipment."
And then Steve responds:
"That cables can be microphponic has never been any secret.
As for distortion, what levels are you measuring? Bruno's AP rig was able to look down to about -145dB and turned up nothing so unless you're able to measure below this I'd be skeptical as to whether the distortion you're measuring is actually being produced by the cables."
It seems that Steve still isn't buying Curl's (or your) test results. He was obviously poking fun at the reviewer in the article, nothing more, nothing less.
Steve quotes you:
"I know that some very limited testing that i've performed has shown differences in distortion and microphony using recently calibrated HP equipment."
And then Steve responds:
"That cables can be microphponic has never been any secret.
As for distortion, what levels are you measuring? Bruno's AP rig was able to look down to about -145dB and turned up nothing so unless you're able to measure below this I'd be skeptical as to whether the distortion you're measuring is actually being produced by the cables."
It seems that Steve still isn't buying Curl's (or your) test results. He was obviously poking fun at the reviewer in the article, nothing more, nothing less.