Marantz av7005 vs av8801 vs Theta Casablanca


So I recently started upgrading some of my system starting with the speakers. I used to have a full Polk lsim 7 series 7.2 system. I have replaced most the Polk speakers with Legacy Audio, Focus se for the front, Marquis center and the new foundation subwoofer. My current pre amp is the Marantz av7005 with Emotiva xpa-1 gen 2 monoblocks for the front 3 channels, marantz mm7055 for the rears and surround. With the new setup I have found a limitation with the av7005, pro version of Audyssey no longer available. The av7005 does not let me run the front 3 channels, along with surround and back, in full range. I recently came across a deal on both a Theta Casablanca and a av8801, decided to buy both and give them a try. I have several questions. Will the av8801 allow me to run full range with the all of the channels? I believe that the Theta is a gen 1, would it be worth bringing this thing up to a newer configuration? I am still in need of better surround speakers and rears, should I try to keep going on the full range thing, legacy line, or dose anyone have suggestions for these speakers that would match with what I have. And last question, should I add width and or height. Thanks guys.

I should add that I watch lots of movies but also listen two channel. 
paullk
In my experience, the Theta stuff is designed to be very fast/clean.  It is conventional op amp I/V after the dac with no Class A or waveform smoothing warmth.  I suspect it is a bad match to your Emotiva amps, which are very fast/neutral.  The Theta will likely do better with a very warm or Class A based amp.

the AV8801, on the other hand, is a very warm/slow sonic signature. I suspect this is the better option in your situation, but you might feel it is too warm/slow.  You could try some silver internects and/or speaker wire if you thought it was still too warm.  
Thanks Auxinput. I was unaware of the class A output section in the Marantz, do you know if the av7005 is also class A output?

I am planning in the future to use the Emotiva amps for the low end and something tube or class A for the mid/high on the front 3.

Side question, have you ever done an A/B comparison of the Emotiva amps in class A vs A/B? I was not able to tell the difference, however we had a cold snap this weekend and my girlfriend and I were listening to the system. I switched the amps to A mode, to warm the room, she stopped dead in hear tracks and said what did you do. Apparently her hearing in much better than mine, makes me question a bi-amp setup.  

I don’t know that the Marantz has a Class A analog stage.  I do know that the AV7005 (and their other processors) will have a fully discrete analog output stage.  They also typically use a slow slew rate op amp for the DAC I/V stage.  This give the sound more warmth and a slight rolloff in high frequency response.

before you start looking at tube amps, I would upgrade the fuses in the Emotiva to Isoclean fuses.  There are two 10A small 5mm x 20mm fuses accessible from a bottom panel.  There are also two 1A small 5mm x 20mm accessable be removing the top cover.  The Isoclean will remove a lot of the harshness and help warm up the sound a bit.

the older Marantz equipment was very warm/slow.  If you feel it is too slow, you can try looking for a Marantz AV7702, which uses the newer HDAM circuits that are faster slew rate.

I have heard the Emotiva Class A mode. It is not a super warm/rich sound.  It keeps the general Emotiva fast/neutral sonic signature, but it smooths out the sound a bit, making it a tiny bit softer and laid back.  It is very subtle.  When the Emotiva Class A switch is off, the sound is somewhat bright/harsh.  The Emotiva circuit is a compromise on this, so when you have Class A switched off, there is waveform crossover distortion because the circuit is not designed strictly for Class AB.

i never recommend a bi-amp setup unless you are running an active crossover or have multiple active full range outputs (such as on the Classe CP800 preamp).  The dual output bi-amp configuration on these processors almost always degrades sound quality.  It sends full range on the normal left/right outputs.  However, it looks at the actual waveform used by this and compares it to the original by using an opamp circuit and then subtracts the “used frequencies” from the full range signal and then outputs this “converted” signal to the upper bi-amp outputs.  In my experience, it is always best not to bi-amp at all and just focus on using the best amps you can.
Ah sorry, I mistyped.  I see you got the av8801.  This still has the older Marantz circuits that are a bit slower/warmer than the newer AV8802A or AV7702 processors.  But if you like the sound, I would keep it for now.  :)
Thanks for all the info aux. I'll definitely try the fuse upgrade for the Emotivas, anything else while I'm in there? I have read about the compromise with the class A A/B mode. I'm OK with these amps for now, there are not as black background as the marantz they have replaced but the additional power is worth it so far with dynamic range.

As far as the bi-amp goes, I was going to try an Ashley analog Crossover rather than messing with the processor. Not there yet nor sure if I will yet.

Just got the av8801 hooked up, having some trouble with audyssey, keeping giving me a phase error for the rear surround speakers. I tried flipping the polarity but still no luck. I did a quick manual setup just to try it out. It is giving me a full range center option and surround in certain configurations. So far I can the center channel is much better than the av7005. Full range makes the voices sound much better and the center effects now have improved impact. I'm going to try and get Audyssey working again tomorrow, I'll update my thoughts if I can get it to work.

Also did a brief analog session, first impressions is a bit more dynamic however the subwoofer output is not functional in 2 channel mode currently. 
One question along the line with replacing the fuses. Should I plug the amplifiers into my Furman power conditioner? It's the 20a version. Thanks 
One of the things I really like about the av8801 and av8802 is that Marantz put in a very large power supply for this processor, so the sound will be very full and have a lot of muscle in the bass and midbass.  
I definitely agree with you on the full sound, I'm just watching Netflix movies right now and I can tell a difference between the av7005 and av8801 in the low frequency content. It just seems smoother than the av7005. I plan to use the av8801 at least through the weekend, providing I can get Audyssey to set up correctly, then I'll try out the Theta. 
One other thing I would note is between the av7005 and av8801 streaming movies sound much less like an mp3. The av7005 would sound very digital at times. 
Sorry, that message posted before I was done.  I don’t know much about av8801 configuration quirks.  Probably best just to read the manual and try to work from there.  There are definitely some processors that will not do bass management (i.e. subwoofer output) for 2-channel music.  My old Krell HTS had that quirk.  However, the new Krell S1200 and Bryston processors will enable sub for 2 channel music.  If you are using an analog source (like turntable or external DAC), the Marantz could be acting as a pass through preamp, in which it does no conversion to digital for bass management.

Good choice working with an active crossover (like I mentioned before).  I have worked with Ashley pro equipment.  I’m assume you are looking at something like the XR-1001 crossover.  The Ashley stuff has a tube like bloom to the sound.  I believe part of the reason is that Ashley’s internal power supply runs at the bare edge limit of the op amps (+/-18V).   If you want something with a flatter more neutral response, look at a used Rane AC22 crossover.  Rane power supply runs at a more conservative +/-15V.

if you are willing to spend the money, the Bryston 10B is probably the best.  Fully discrete Class A analog circuits with big linear power supply.  Make sure you know which version.  Some versions have RCA, some XLR.  The Bryston will have the most resolution/transparency compared to Rane or Ashley.

if you can get the Emotiva and Marantz to sound good, you may not feel the need to bixamp.

There is nothing that you can do easily with the Emotiva other than a fuse upgrade.  I had XPA-1 Gen 1 in my system.  Currently, I am running with XPR-1 and XPA-1L amps.  Both of these amp versions use two fuses (such as 2 x 4A for the XPAx1L).   I found that my Emotiva amps sounded the best with one Isoclean fuse and one Furutech fuse.  It was an excellent balance of clarity and warmth.  I found that running two Isoclean was just too warm/slow.  Running with two Furutech was too thin/lean.  I am using a really fast high resolution Krell processor (not warm at all). In your situation, it might be that two Furutech would sound best because the Marantz is so warm/slow.  The type of interconnects and speaker cable and power cables could also affect the sound.

fuses are used to help “tune” your system to get further towards the type of sound you want.  I just gave you my two preferred fuses.  You can start however you like.  If you do get fuses, make sure to burn in before making any decisions.  100 hours for the Isoclean.  With Furutech, you need about 240 hours before it calms down (because of the rhodium).
Oh, you could do fuse upgrade in your Marantz AV8801 as well, if you wish. For this, I would recommend a 2A Furutech for the most speed and resolution. I don’t know the physical size, as I think the fuse is inside somewhere.

if you are cost conscious and don’t want to waste money experimenting with multiple Furutech/Isoclean fuse combinations, you could try the generic PADIS fuses for the Emotiva amps. The Isoclean are very warm, but very inviting in the sound.  There is definitely a magic with the Isoclean. The Furutech are extremely high resolution and transparent. The PADIS are somewhat in between.

as far as the Furman goes, I don’t know. Usually, people say to plug the larger amps directly into the wall, but others have had success with power conditioner. Best suggestion is to try it both ways and see if the Furman restricts the sound. Plugging into the wall could give more current which would be more muscle in the bass and the instruments would hit with more authority.
Thanks for all the input Aux. I'm going to get some fuses and give them a try after I A, B, C the preamps. 

Just a brief update on the av8801, I used the on screen Audyssey setup and was able to pinpoint the phase error that way. Looks like when I flipped the phase I might actually kept it the same on the rr surround. I was also able to run full range on the front 3 and after running Audyssey was able to add the subwoofer into the mix during 2 channel. I really like to feel the music. The room correction seems to sound much better than the av7005, after I tweaked some settings more to my taste. I will say overall the av8801 sounds great, I did notice a slightly digital / mp3 sound from the surround and rear channels on DTS matrix while streaming music. I'm going to try it tomorrow with vinyl. The av8801 seems to get pretty hot, doesn't seem to matter what you are doing with it. I think it may have cut off a few times, I thought it was the digital source the first few times but while I was listening to vinyl it cut off for a second but I was in the other room so didn't observe. I'm going to keep an eye on this, turned my rack fans on. I think I'm pretty happy with the current setting so I ordered a set of bookshelves to try out the height / width options. I'm going to continue with the av8801 until they get here before I hook up the Theta. 
Just another brief update, the av8801 is really growing on me now that I have the room correction figured out. I think the set of speakers I ordered to use as wides will be here today so I'm excited to see what 9.1 will sound like. I can say that the av7005 was great but I didn't like the room correction, this all changes with the av8801. I'm actually thinking about just selling the Theta because I really like all these channels, I'm not sure what it would cost to bring the theta to a 7.1 or a 9.1.
Theta upgrade will be extremely expensive.  You are probably looking at $4,000 to $7,000 to upgrade to latest, depending on which DSP version and DAC boards you need.  If you want 9.1, it's probably over $10k for sure.
Agreed, I think my money is still better spent on the rest of the speakers. Maybe someday I will be at the Theta level. 
The Marantz AV8801 is a very nice pre/pro and a really good 2-ch preamp. I did listen to the AV8802, but quite frankly, I preferred the AV8801. I have since separated by 2ch and my HT, so the 8801 will be sold, just overkill for what I need now
I have been using the av8801, replacing the av7005,  for about a month now and I absolutely love it. The built in surround sound modes for a 2 channel signal are night and day better than av7005. Analog music is better also. I have used 2 inexpensive active crossovers to extract the front subwoofer signal and blend in with the dedicated subwoofer channel, this allows me to leave the front 3 channels in full range mode. I still have the Theta, I think I am going to try it just for comparison to fulfill this thread. 
Based on all that I have read, the general consensus would be that the 8802 is faster and more detailed than the 8801 (more attack and clarity).  Marantz engineered a slightly faster slew rate on their analog circuits for the 8802 (using the new HDAM circuit).  The older 8801 will be slower/warmer sounding.
Just a brief update, I tested the Theta, was only able to do this in 2ch mode due to lack of time and source material. Also I've grown to love my current 9.2 setup and can't image life with 5.1 lol. As described above by Aux, the Theta was very fast/accurate. It sounded good but didn't really seem like a good match for my current setup, although I didn't take too much time here in tweaking. I will say putting the XPA's into class A mode was more noticeable than with the Marantz.