Review: ZYX UNIverse II Cartridge


Category: Analog

Less Is More

The innovative and creative genius at ZYX has married two great achievements into a single cartridge. The inner workings of the UNIverse have been re-housed in the semi-nude body of the 4D to create the UNIverse II. It is a match made in heaven.

On hearing the UNIverse II for the first time we noticed a nice incremental increase in speed and resolution, resulting in a little more articulation, weight, detail and space around the instruments, compared to the original UNIverse. A pleasant improvement that wasn’t entirely unexpected from the change of the cartridge body. As a few more LP’s were played we noticed that the exceptional air and separation around the violins and woodwinds that we had always enjoyed now extended to the tubas and double basses. Pulling out records with rich, densely scored bass lines was an eye-opener. All the bass instruments were in their own individual space with surprisingly greater resolution of textural detail. Yet despite this avalanche of additional information, what really came through was the rhythmic punch and drive of the music. There is an added unification of the whole sound space that came with the additional spacial focussing of all the orchestral instruments. The UNIverse lifted the veil between the listener and the sound space. The UNIverse II completely immerses the listener in the sound space of the recording.

With the original UNIverse it was often possible to get lost in the admiration of the instrumental detail that was revealed in the mid range and highs to infinity. Despite extending this level of resolution well into the bass, it is the music and the emotional intent of the composer that comes through with the UNIverse II. Our best efforts to assess the clinical advantages of the UNIverse II were often cut short as we were pulled back into the music. It is not easy to evaluate the increased width and depth of the sound stage with involuntary head and shoulder sways induced by the beat of the music. For those that subscribe that music is built from the bass up, the UNIVerse II provides a strong, immensely satisfying and solid foundation.

The last thing I want to do is give the impression of detail, upon detail – but where’s the music? The music is there, first and foremost, the added detail enhances the listening experience. Those familiar with the extraordinary openness of the UNIverse know how revealing the sound can be for instruments like violin and acoustic guitar. They sound like real instruments and it is easy to visualize the sound box behind the strings. The UNIverse II extends this level of realism to the lower registers. There is a far greater clarification of the individual voices of each organ pipe. It is not just a low “C”; the individual pipe is now easily recognized. As the size and shape of the body of a harpsichord can be so easily constructed from all the sonic information generated by the UNIverse, the same is now true for kettle drums with the UNIverse II. Everything can now be heard, from the striking of the taut skin and the reflections and resonances within the body of the drum to the subtle differences between two adjacent drums. The open body of the 4 D frees the UNIverse II to generate added weight, solidity and impact of every drum beat. The redesign has eliminated any perceived bass constraint of the original UNIverse.

The 4D body also brings the set up advantages of the 4D to the UNIvese II. As with any cartridge, the more time and care spent on alignment, tracking force and VTA optimization the better the results. This was especially true for the UNIverse; once the alignment and tracking force had been set properly then the VTA needed to be adjusted for each LP to get the very best sound. As with the Atmos/4D the UNIverse II has significantly broader tolerance for less than absolutely perfect arm height. We swapped records without adjusting the arm height for each LP and felt no overwhelming need to make any change. We have bemused many audiophile friends by our constant adjustment of arm height to get the very best out of the UNIverse. This is due to the drop in performance when the VTA isn’t exactly right. The arm height does need to be keyed in for the UNIverse II, but there is no need to make constant adjustments. Optimal sound requires optimal set-up, but the performance drop off due to the slight variations in arm height from one LP to the next are not significant.

The UNIverse II delivers all of the phenomenal air, detail and clarity of the original UNIverse and extends those qualities to the bass. The 4D body enhances all of the strengths of the UNIverse with better imaging, resulting in wider and deeper sound stages. With more percussive impact and rhythmic drive the UNIverse II easily out performs both the UNIverse I and the 4D. Our previous review of the Atmos (4D) left options as to which cartridge was better suited to any particular type of music. With the UNIverse II outperforming both predecessors there is no question about which top performing ZYX cartridge to invest in.

Less is more - so very much more.


Associated gear
Click to view my Virtual System

Similar products
All the cartridges listed in my UNIverse I review plus Ortofon A90
dougdeacon

Showing 5 responses by albertporter

Don_c55,

I see you are not new here, so you should know that Dougdeacon does not march to anyone's drum, he makes up his own mind and speaks from his heart.

If you wish to disagree with him that's fine and encouraged. That's what these forums are for, but you are mistaken that Doug did this for any reason other than it's the truth from his perspective.
Don_c55,

Don't get me wrong, I dislike ZYX cartridges. I've had three different ones in my system and returned them all. Still, I think Doug is being honest and that's why I defended him.

I have equipment in my system I love but I'm sure there are others at Audiogon that would hate it. That's the nature of high end gear and for that matter, the music we choose to listen to.
10-28-12: Raythai
Hi everybody:
I wonder any of us has an A and B comparison between ZYX Universe II and Air Tight Supreme PC1

I've had them both in my system. I'm a fan of Air Tight and the Lyra Atlas so that's my vote.

These two (ZYX and Air Tight) are so different I don't think anyone would prefer them equally.

If you are currently a ZYX fan you should stick with what you like. If you've not heard either cartridge, you should make that a priority before spending that much cash.
Doug,

There was a time when SORAsound lost representation of the ZYX line and the new importer (or whatever title) sent me multiple ZYX cartridges on three different occasions.

It's possible they were not the latest version as all things in high end audio seem to acquire additional numerals and letters representing changes. However, there is house sound for ZYX and it does not work for me.

It can also be said there is a house sound for all cartridges regardless of their brand. Transducers always play a huge role in system personality.

It's quite possible Raythai would prefer ZYX over Air Tight, so agreed at least that he should try for an audition regardless.
11-02-12: Lewm
Having recently and repeatedly listened to a ZYX UNIverse (the original) in a system using a tonearm, turntable, and phono stage (Doshi) nearly identical to Doug's, I can say that his verbal description of the sound of that cartridge is near perfect. I would not change one word. He hears it the way I hear it. So, does it matter whether Doug has an "in" with Sorasound, or not? I am sure he must have a friendship with Mehran, since he is at least a very good customer, and it is not beyond my imagination to think that Doug might get a discount on an $8500 cartridge, perhaps the same discount that anyone else can also hope for. Yes, this relationship may make it difficult for Doug to be objective. �So what? I am totally convinced that he is "telling it like it is"

Exactly.

I know Doug is speaking from the heart and truthful when he says he prefers a given product. I also seriously a special deal would change his mind.

We all have our favorites. I believe each decision is arrived at by a combination of personal preference and interaction with all the other components and the room.