NS-10's were used a lot in recording studios as near-field monitors. Your 30T's may be similar in design. The NS-10's tended to be a bit bright on the top and rather revealing through the midrange. This however is working in your favor with the Scott Amp which might be a bit soft on top. You still get the advantage of the midrange while balancing out the top end. If the efficiency is the same as above, i.e. 103dB/1 watt/1 meter that's a great fit. Sensitivity is rated at 1w/1m which mean the 30T's are putting out 103dB when fed 1 watt of power at a distance of 1 meter. Very efficient speakers as the average is usually around 86-88dB 1w/1m. The only issue you may have would be background noise.
Scott amp update/speaker question
After almost 2 months, I got my Scott tube amp back, all repaired. It is working beautifully, and I am revisiting a lot of music and hearing all sorts of new things - however - it took me trying FIVE sets of speakers to get to that point. What I ended up liking the most was a ridiculous fluke - I lucked into a criminally cheap pair of Yamaha NS 30 T studio monitors, just a couple days ago, and so far this is the pair I like the most with the Scott amp, by far. In addition to exceptional definition and clarity, the stereo stage seems much wider with this pair than any of the others I tried. So my question - I could find almost no technical information about these online: Does anyone have a set, and/or know what their efficiency is? Thanks!
6 responses Add your response