I think that OP is saying that a pure digital non Bluetooth transport should blow away a Bluetooth DAC by a wide margin and he isn’t perceiving that as occurring.
I am confused by his setup. Where is the Bluetooth receiver here? In the Cambridge Amp? Then the Cambridge Amp must be processing both the BT and the digital signals? (Which means that it’s really a DAC/Amp). I don’t own a DAC that processes Bluetooth, so I don’t know if these DACs process the Bluetooth signal with same chip as a conventional digital signal.
I used to own that Wadi transport but sold it after a few months as I just wasn’t using it. I remember that it made my iPod sound like it was on steroids
I am confused by his setup. Where is the Bluetooth receiver here? In the Cambridge Amp? Then the Cambridge Amp must be processing both the BT and the digital signals? (Which means that it’s really a DAC/Amp). I don’t own a DAC that processes Bluetooth, so I don’t know if these DACs process the Bluetooth signal with same chip as a conventional digital signal.
I used to own that Wadi transport but sold it after a few months as I just wasn’t using it. I remember that it made my iPod sound like it was on steroids